Literature DB >> 18802931

Intrinsic disorder explains diverse nuclear roles of chromatin remodeling proteins.

Kuljeet Singh Sandhu1.   

Abstract

Chromatin remodelers, a group of proteins involved in nucleosome re-positioning and modification, have extensive range of interacting partners. They form multimeric complexes and interact with modified histones, transcription, splicing, and replication factors, DNA, RNA, and the factors related to the maintenance of chromosome structure. Such diverse range of interactions is hard to explain with the presumed highly structured form of the protein. In the current analysis, the conformations of chromatin remodelers were explored using protein disorder prediction algorithms. The study revealed that a significant proportion (p < 2.2e-16) of these proteins harbor at least one long region of intrinsic disorder (>70 aa). These unstructured regions do not exhibit any preference to the N/C terminal or middle of the protein. They do not show any significant representation in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) structure repository. Limited examples from PDB indicate direct involvement of disordered regions in binding of chromatin remodeling proteins to naked or modified DNA, histones, and other chromatin-related factors. Furthermore, intrinsic disorder seen in these proteins correlates to the presence of low sequence complexity regions (p = 1.851e-10) particularly the tandem repeats of hydrophilic and charged amino acids. This probably hints at their evolutionary origin via repeat expansion. The disordered regions may enable these proteins to reversibly bind to various interacting partners and eventually contribute to functional diversity and specialization of chromatin remodeling complexes. These could also endow combinatorial action of multiple domains within a protein. We further discuss the prominent association of intrinsic disorder with other chromatin-related proteins and its functional relevance therein. Copyright 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18802931     DOI: 10.1002/jmr.915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Recognit        ISSN: 0952-3499            Impact factor:   2.137


  21 in total

1.  Compaction of chromatin by diverse Polycomb group proteins requires localized regions of high charge.

Authors:  Daniel J Grau; Brad A Chapman; Joe D Garlick; Mark Borowsky; Nicole J Francis; Robert E Kingston
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  A unique missense allele of BAF155, a core BAF chromatin remodeling complex protein, causes neural tube closure defects in mice.

Authors:  Laura Harmacek; Dawn E Watkins-Chow; Jianfu Chen; Kenneth L Jones; William J Pavan; J Michael Salbaum; Lee Niswander
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.964

3.  Expanding the proteome: disordered and alternatively folded proteins.

Authors:  H Jane Dyson
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.318

4.  The cis conformation of proline leads to weaker binding of a p53 peptide to MDM2 compared to trans.

Authors:  Yingqian Ada Zhan; F Marty Ytreberg
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.013

5.  Intrinsically disordered proteins and conformational noise: implications in cancer.

Authors:  Gita Mahmoudabadi; Krithika Rajagopalan; Robert H Getzenberg; Sridhar Hannenhalli; Govindan Rangarajan; Prakash Kulkarni
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Roles of intrinsic disorder in protein-nucleic acid interactions.

Authors:  H Jane Dyson
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2011-08-26

7.  IDPology of the living cell: intrinsic disorder in the subcellular compartments of the human cell.

Authors:  Bi Zhao; Akila Katuwawala; Vladimir N Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Effect of Grafting on Aggregation of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Dino Osmanovic; Yitzhak Rabin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Drosophila SAF-B links the nuclear matrix, chromosomes, and transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Catalina Alfonso-Parra; Keith A Maggert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles.

Authors:  Alain Coletta; John W Pinney; David Y Weiss Solís; James Marsh; Steve R Pettifer; Teresa K Attwood
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-04-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.