Literature DB >> 18802849

Ethics, pandemics, and the duty to treat.

Heidi Malm1, Thomas May, Leslie P Francis, Saad B Omer, Daniel A Salmon, Robert Hood.   

Abstract

Numerous grounds have been offered for the view that healthcare workers have a duty to treat, including expressed consent, implied consent, special training, reciprocity (also called the social contract view), and professional oaths and codes. Quite often, however, these grounds are simply asserted without being adequately defended or without the defenses being critically evaluated. This essay aims to help remedy that problem by providing a critical examination of the strengths and weaknesses of each of these five grounds for asserting that healthcare workers have a duty to treat, especially as that duty would arise in the context of an infectious disease pandemic. Ultimately, it argues that none of the defenses is currently sufficient to ground the kind of duty that would be needed in a pandemic. It concludes by sketching some practical recommendations in that regard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18802849     DOI: 10.1080/15265160802317974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  36 in total

1.  Currents in contemporary ethics. Should health care providers get treatment priority in an influenza pandemic?

Authors:  Mark A Rothstein
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 2.  Intensivist and COVID-19 in the United States of America: a narrative review of clinical roles, current workforce, and future direction.

Authors:  Nadia Nazir Jatoi; Sana Awan; Maham Abbasi; Momina Mariam Marufi; Muhammad Ahmed; Shehzeen Fatima Memon; Nimra Farooqui; Maaz Hasan Khan; Hadi Saiyid; Abdurrahman Husain; Kaneez Fatima; Shahram Maroof; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2022-03-14

3.  Healthcare Workers From Diverse Ethnicities and Their Perceptions of Risk and Experiences of Risk Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Insights From the United Kingdom-REACH Study.

Authors:  Irtiza Qureshi; Mayuri Gogoi; Fatimah Wobi; Jonathan Chaloner; Amani Al-Oraibi; Osama Hassan; Daniel Pan; Laura B Nellums; Manish Pareek
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-01

4.  Canadian survey on pandemic flu preparations.

Authors:  Paul Ritvo; Kumanan Wilson; J L Gibson; C Guglietti; C S Tracy; J X Nie; A R Jadad; R E G Upshur
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Willingness of the local health department workforce to respond to infectious disease events: empirical, ethical, and legal considerations.

Authors:  Holly A Taylor; Lainie Rutkow; Daniel J Barnett
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2014-06-25

6.  Parental vaccine attitudes, beliefs, and practices: initial evidence in California after a vaccine policy change.

Authors:  Taylor A Holroyd; Amanda C Howa; Paul L Delamater; Nicola P Klein; Alison M Buttenheim; Rupali J Limaye; Tina M Proveaux; Saad B Omer; Daniel A Salmon
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Heroes or cowards: healthcare workers' autonomy right versus patient care duties during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sina Azadnajafabad
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2020-12-27

8.  A survey of Canadian emergency physicians' experiences and perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Nathalie Gaucher; Evelyne D Trottier; Anne-Josee Côté; Huma Ali; Bertrand Lavoie; Claude-Julie Bourque; Samina Ali
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.929

9.  In the name of the greater good?

Authors:  K Kirkwood
Journal:  Emerg Health Threats J       Date:  2010-03-31

10.  "The Duty to Prevent" during an epidemic situation like 2015 Korean MERS outbreak.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2015-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.