Literature DB >> 18802808

Prevention of skin cancer in primary healthcare: an evaluation of three different prevention effort levels and the applicability of a phototest.

Magnus Falk1, Chris Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: The high skin cancer incidence in western society, and its known association with sun exposure habits, makes the area an important target for prevention. We investigated, in a primary healthcare setting, differentiated levels of prevention efforts directed at the propensity of the patient to change his/her sun habits, sun protection behaviour, and attitudes, after information intervention. Additionally, the impact of the performance of a phototest to determine individual sun sensitivity was evaluated.
METHODS: 308 patients visiting a primary healthcare centre in southern Sweden completed a questionnaire concerning sun habits, sun protection behaviour, and attitudes, and were randomized into one of three groups, representing increasing levels of prevention effort in terms of resources. Feedback on their questionnaire and general preventive sun protection advice was given, in the first group by means of a letter, and in the second and third groups by a doctor's consultation. Group 3 also underwent a phototest, with a self-reading assessment and a written follow-up of the phototest result. Change of sun habits, behaviour, and attitudes, based on the Transtheoretical Model of Behaviour Change and on Likert scale scorings, was evaluated after 6 months, by a repeated questionnaire.
RESULTS: Prevention mediated by a doctor's consultation had a clearly better impact on the subjects. The addition of a phototest did not further reinforce this effect in the group as a whole, but it did for a subgroup of individuals with high ultraviolet (UV) sensitivity, as determined by the phototest itself, suggesting that this might actually be a tool to improve outcome in this high-risk group.
CONCLUSION: A personal doctor's consultation is a valuable tool in the effective delivery of preventive information in the general practice setting. In individuals with high UV-sensitivity and thus high risk for skin cancer the performance of a photo-test reinforces a positive outcome in habits, behaviour and attitudes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18802808     DOI: 10.1080/13814780802423430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract        ISSN: 1381-4788            Impact factor:   1.904


  8 in total

1.  Excessive tanning: some psychopathological explanations.

Authors:  Randy A Sansone; Lori A Sansone
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2010-06

2.  Sun protection advice mediated by the general practitioner: an effective way to achieve long-term change of behaviour and attitudes related to sun exposure?

Authors:  Magnus Falk; Henrik Magnusson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  Sun protection and skin self-examination in melanoma survivors.

Authors:  Urvi J Mujumdar; Jennifer L Hay; Yvette C Monroe-Hinds; Amanda J Hummer; Colin B Begg; Homer B Wilcox; Susan A Oliveria; Marianne Berwick
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  [Primary prevention in the context of skin cancer screening].

Authors:  M Krensel; I Schäfer; N Zander; M Augustin
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 5.  Tanning bed use and melanoma: Establishing risk and improving prevention interventions.

Authors:  Marie Z Le Clair; Myles G Cockburn
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-01-14

6.  Perceived relevance of educative information on public (skin) health: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Daniela Haluza; Renate Cervinka
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2013-03-28

7.  Feasibility of a GP delivered skin cancer prevention intervention in Australia.

Authors:  Kylie Vuong; Lyndal Trevena; Billie Bonevski; Bruce K Armstrong
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Perceived Relevance of Educative Information on Public (Skin) Health: Results of a Representative, Population-Based Telephone Survey.

Authors:  Daniela Haluza; Markus Schwab; Stana Simic; Renate Cervinka; Hanns Moshammer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.