PURPOSE: To identify children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at initial diagnosis who are at risk for inferior response to therapy by using molecular signatures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gene expression profiles were generated from bone marrow blasts at initial diagnosis from a cohort of 99 children with National Cancer Institute-defined high-risk ALL who were treated uniformly on the Children's Oncology Group (COG) 1961 study. For prediction of early response, genes that correlated to marrow status on day 7 were identified on a training set and were validated on a test set. An additional signature was correlated with long-term outcome, and the predictive models were validated on three large, independent patient cohorts. Results We identified a 24-probe set signature that was highly predictive of day 7 marrow status on the test set (P = .0061). Pathways were identified that may play a role in early blast regression. We have also identified a 47-probe set signature (which represents 41 unique genes) that was predictive of long-term outcome in our data set as well as three large independent data sets of patients with childhood ALL who were treated on different protocols. However, we did not find sufficient evidence for the added significance of these genes and the derived predictive models when other known prognostic features, such as age, WBC, and karyotype, were included in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Genes and pathways that play a role in early blast regression may identify patients who may be at risk for inferior responses to treatment. A fully validated predictive gene expression signature was defined for high-risk ALL that provided insight into the biologic mechanisms of treatment failure.
PURPOSE: To identify children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at initial diagnosis who are at risk for inferior response to therapy by using molecular signatures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gene expression profiles were generated from bone marrow blasts at initial diagnosis from a cohort of 99 children with National Cancer Institute-defined high-risk ALL who were treated uniformly on the Children's Oncology Group (COG) 1961 study. For prediction of early response, genes that correlated to marrow status on day 7 were identified on a training set and were validated on a test set. An additional signature was correlated with long-term outcome, and the predictive models were validated on three large, independent patient cohorts. Results We identified a 24-probe set signature that was highly predictive of day 7 marrow status on the test set (P = .0061). Pathways were identified that may play a role in early blast regression. We have also identified a 47-probe set signature (which represents 41 unique genes) that was predictive of long-term outcome in our data set as well as three large independent data sets of patients with childhood ALL who were treated on different protocols. However, we did not find sufficient evidence for the added significance of these genes and the derived predictive models when other known prognostic features, such as age, WBC, and karyotype, were included in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Genes and pathways that play a role in early blast regression may identify patients who may be at risk for inferior responses to treatment. A fully validated predictive gene expression signature was defined for high-risk ALL that provided insight into the biologic mechanisms of treatment failure.
Authors: M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: A A Alizadeh; M B Eisen; R E Davis; C Ma; I S Lossos; A Rosenwald; J C Boldrick; H Sabet; T Tran; X Yu; J I Powell; L Yang; G E Marti; T Moore; J Hudson; L Lu; D B Lewis; R Tibshirani; G Sherlock; W C Chan; T C Greiner; D D Weisenburger; J O Armitage; R Warnke; R Levy; W Wilson; M R Grever; J C Byrd; D Botstein; P O Brown; L M Staudt Journal: Nature Date: 2000-02-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: W A Kamps; J P M Bökkerink; F G A J Hakvoort-Cammel; A J P Veerman; R S Weening; E R van Wering; J F van Weerden; J Hermans; R Slater; E van den Berg; W G Kroes; A van der Does-van den Berg Journal: Leukemia Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: M J Brisco; P J Sykes; G Dolman; E Hughes; S H Neoh; L Peng; L E Snell; I R Toogood; M S Rice; A A Morley Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Amy Holleman; Meyling H Cheok; Monique L den Boer; Wenjian Yang; Anjo J P Veerman; Karin M Kazemier; Deqing Pei; Cheng Cheng; Ching-Hon Pui; Mary V Relling; Gritta E Janka-Schaub; Rob Pieters; William E Evans Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-08-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M J Borowitz; D J Pullen; J J Shuster; D Viswanatha; K Montgomery; C L Willman; B Camitta Journal: Leukemia Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Nita L Seibel; Peter G Steinherz; Harland N Sather; James B Nachman; Cynthia Delaat; Lawrence J Ettinger; David R Freyer; Leonard A Mattano; Caroline A Hastings; Charles M Rubin; Kathy Bertolone; Janet L Franklin; Nyla A Heerema; Torrey L Mitchell; Allan F Pyesmany; Mei K La; Cheryl Edens; Paul S Gaynon Journal: Blood Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: J B Nachman; H N Sather; M G Sensel; M E Trigg; J M Cherlow; J N Lukens; L Wolff; F M Uckun; P S Gaynon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-06-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eng-Juh Yeoh; Mary E Ross; Sheila A Shurtleff; W Kent Williams; Divyen Patel; Rami Mahfouz; Fred G Behm; Susana C Raimondi; Mary V Relling; Anami Patel; Cheng Cheng; Dario Campana; Dawn Wilkins; Xiaodong Zhou; Jinyan Li; Huiqing Liu; Ching-Hon Pui; William E Evans; Clayton Naeve; Limsoon Wong; James R Downing Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: S-H Chen; W Yang; Y Fan; G Stocco; K R Crews; J J Yang; S W Paugh; C-H Pui; W E Evans; M V Relling Journal: Leukemia Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Huining Kang; I-Ming Chen; Carla S Wilson; Edward J Bedrick; Richard C Harvey; Susan R Atlas; Meenakshi Devidas; Charles G Mullighan; Xuefei Wang; Maurice Murphy; Kerem Ar; Walker Wharton; Michael J Borowitz; W Paul Bowman; Deepa Bhojwani; William L Carroll; Bruce M Camitta; Gregory H Reaman; Malcolm A Smith; James R Downing; Stephen P Hunger; Cheryl L Willman Journal: Blood Date: 2009-10-30 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Edward Allan R Sison; Rachel E Rau; Emily McIntyre; Li Li; Donald Small; Patrick Brown Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Stephen P Hunger; Mignon L Loh; James A Whitlock; Naomi J Winick; William L Carroll; Meenakshi Devidas; Elizabeth A Raetz Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Seong Lin Khaw; Santi Suryani; Kathryn Evans; Jennifer Richmond; Alissa Robbins; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Catherine A Billups; Stephen W Erickson; Yuelong Guo; Peter J Houghton; Malcolm A Smith; Hernan Carol; Andrew W Roberts; David C S Huang; Richard B Lock Journal: Blood Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 22.113