Literature DB >> 18801944

Knee immobilization for pain control after a hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial.

Laurie A Hiemstra1, S Mark Heard, Treny M Sasyniuk, Greg L Buchko, Jeremy G Reed, Bradley J Monteleone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study will attempt to evaluate the efficacy of knee immobilization on patient pain levels after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: There is no difference in visual analog scale pain scores 2 days after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between patients who wear a knee immobilizer and those who do not wear a knee immobilizer. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 40 years who met study inclusion criteria were eligible. Patients meeting intraoperative inclusion criteria were randomized (immobilizer or no immobilizer) after wound closure. The immobilizer used was a soft, unhinged brace with Velcro straps. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative protocols were standardized. The primary outcome was patient self-assessed pain using a 0-to-100-mm visual analog scale at day 2 after surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain and analgesic use in the first 14 days after surgery, complications, and range of motion (approximately 3 weeks postoperatively). A sample size estimate was calculated and resulted in the need for 44 patients per group.
RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were enrolled; 88 patients were randomized, and 14 were excluded intraoperatively. There was no difference in mean visual analog scale pain scores at 2 days after surgery between immobilized and nonimmobilized patients (32.6 and 35.2, respectively; P = .59; difference, -2.6; 95% confidence interval, -12.2 to 6.9). There were no differences between groups in medication consumed, range of motion, or complications. Pain and analgesic use were the same for both groups at 7 and 14 days postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: No differences in pain or any of the secondary outcomes were detected between immobilized and nonimmobilized patients at any point during the first 14 days after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18801944     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508322896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of isolated and multiple ligament injuries of the knee: anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, indications for repair, surgery].

Authors:  O Yastrebov; P Lobenhoffer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  L M Kruse; B Gray; R W Wright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Principles of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation.

Authors:  Tolga Saka
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-09-18

4.  Current practice variations in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Delhi.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Amit Kumar Agarwal; Sachin Ingole; Vipul Vijay
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-01-21

5.  A comparison of pain scores and medication use in patients undergoing single-bundle or double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Simon A Macdonald; S M Heard; Laurie A Hiemstra; Gregory M L Buchko; Sarah Kerslake; Treny M Sasyniuk
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Rehabilitation Predictors of Clinical Outcome Following Revision ACL Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Ian D Engler; Ehab M Nazzal; Jonathan F Dalton; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Jonathan D Hughes; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Della Villa; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Comparison of published orthopaedic trauma trials following registration in Clinicaltrials.gov.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; Meryam Jan; Holly N Smith; Nizar N Mahomed; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation: MOON Guidelines.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Amanda K Haas; Joy Anderson; Gary Calabrese; John Cavanaugh; Timothy E Hewett; Dawn Lorring; Christopher McKenzie; Emily Preston; Glenn Williams
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 10.  A systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions.

Authors:  Aoife Healy; Sybil Farmer; Anand Pandyan; Nachiappan Chockalingam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.