Literature DB >> 18801594

Removing bacteria from hospital surfaces: a laboratory comparison of ultramicrofibre and standard cloths.

M W D Wren1, M S M Rollins, A Jeanes, T J Hall, P G Coën, V A Gant.   

Abstract

We compared the ability of ultramicrofibre-woven cloths with conventional cloths moistened with water only, for their ability to remove several types of organisms relevant to hospital-acquired infections from a variety of surfaces in hospitals. We showed that ultramicrofibre cloths consistently outperformed conventional cloths in their decontamination ability, across all surfaces, and irrespective of whether the bacteria were coated on to the surfaces with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or PBS containing horse serum to simulate real-life soiling. The ability of the cloths to remove bacteria from surfaces was assessed by contact plating and colony formation, and by swabbing and measurement of ATP bioluminescence. The results suggest potential for use of ultramicrofibre in healthcare environments. Further studies are required, however, to define accurately how these cloths, which are designed to be used without detergent or biocides, might be capable of safe and effective deployment and recycling in the healthcare environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18801594     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

Review 1.  Controlling hospital-acquired infection: focus on the role of the environment and new technologies for decontamination.

Authors:  Stephanie J Dancer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Persistence of nosocomial pathogens on various fabrics.

Authors:  Ozlem Koca; Ulku Altoparlak; Ahmet Ayyildiz; Hasan Kaynar
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2012-04

3.  Potent bactericidal efficacy of copper oxide impregnated non-porous solid surfaces.

Authors:  Alastair B Monk; Vikram Kanmukhla; Ken Trinder; Gadi Borkow
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.605

4.  Role of surface energy and nano-roughness in the removal efficiency of bacterial contamination by nonwoven wipes from frequently touched surfaces.

Authors:  Nicholas W M Edwards; Emma L Best; Simon D Connell; Parikshit Goswami; Chris M Carr; Mark H Wilcox; Stephen J Russell
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 8.090

5.  Effectiveness of various cleaning and disinfectant products on Clostridium difficile spores of PCR ribotypes 010, 014 and 027.

Authors:  N Kenters; E G W Huijskens; S C J de Wit; I G J M Sanders; J van Rosmalen; E J Kuijper; A Voss
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 4.887

6.  Comparison of steam technology and a two-step cleaning (water/detergent) and disinfecting (1,000 resp. 5,000 ppm hypochlorite) method using microfiber cloth for environmental control of multidrug-resistant organisms in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Nefise Oztoprak; Filiz Kizilates; Duygu Percin
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2019-10-24

7.  Antimicrobial efficacy of a novel eucalyptus oil, chlorhexidine digluconate and isopropyl alcohol biocide formulation.

Authors:  Emma Hendry; Barbara Conway; Tony Worthington
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  The dynamics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus exposure in a hospital model and the potential for environmental intervention.

Authors:  Nottasorn Plipat; Ian H Spicknall; James S Koopman; Joseph Ns Eisenberg
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 9.  A unified framework for developing effective hygiene procedures for hands, environmental surfaces and laundry in healthcare, domestic, food handling and other settings.

Authors:  Sally F Bloomfield; Philip C Carling; Martin Exner
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2017-06-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.