Firouz Daneshgari1, Wesley Kong, Mia Swartz. 1. Department of Urology and Female Pelvic Surgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA. daneshgf@upstate.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Mid urethral slings are becoming the first line surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women. We reviewed the complications of mid urethral sling placement and their potential pathophysiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a literature search on MEDLINE from 1995 to 2007 using the key words sling, complications, mid-urethral slings, transvaginal tape, transobturator tape, trials, pathophysiology and complications. The Cochrane database was also searched. The results were summarized according to the type of mid urethral slings reported. RESULTS: There were 928 MEDLINE citations for sling and complications, 279 for sling and complications and bladder, and 68 for sling and complications and voiding dysfunction. The reported complication rates ranged from 4.3% to 75.1% for retropubic and 10.5% to 31.3% for transobturator mid urethral slings. Complications included bladder perforation, hemorrhage, bowel injury, vaginal extrusion, de novo urgency and urge incontinence, urinary tract infections and voiding dysfunction. Retropubic mid urethral slings led to a higher occurrence of complications such as bladder perforation and hematoma. In addition, the retropubic approach resulted in serious complications such as bowel injury, major vascular injury and death. Groin pain was more common after the transobturator approach. Experimental studies indicated that the potential mechanisms for sling complications may include vaginal dissection, denervation injury and bladder remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: Mid urethral slings result in bothersome complications which should not be minimized. Awareness of these complications should encourage improvements in patient counseling as well as further investigation of the underlying mechanisms. Decreasing complications should be considered an important outcome for future clinical studies of mid urethral slings.
PURPOSE: Mid urethral slings are becoming the first line surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women. We reviewed the complications of mid urethral sling placement and their potential pathophysiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a literature search on MEDLINE from 1995 to 2007 using the key words sling, complications, mid-urethral slings, transvaginal tape, transobturator tape, trials, pathophysiology and complications. The Cochrane database was also searched. The results were summarized according to the type of mid urethral slings reported. RESULTS: There were 928 MEDLINE citations for sling and complications, 279 for sling and complications and bladder, and 68 for sling and complications and voiding dysfunction. The reported complication rates ranged from 4.3% to 75.1% for retropubic and 10.5% to 31.3% for transobturator mid urethral slings. Complications included bladder perforation, hemorrhage, bowel injury, vaginal extrusion, de novo urgency and urge incontinence, urinary tract infections and voiding dysfunction. Retropubic mid urethral slings led to a higher occurrence of complications such as bladder perforation and hematoma. In addition, the retropubic approach resulted in serious complications such as bowel injury, major vascular injury and death. Groin pain was more common after the transobturator approach. Experimental studies indicated that the potential mechanisms for sling complications may include vaginal dissection, denervation injury and bladder remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: Mid urethral slings result in bothersome complications which should not be minimized. Awareness of these complications should encourage improvements in patient counseling as well as further investigation of the underlying mechanisms. Decreasing complications should be considered an important outcome for future clinical studies of mid urethral slings.
Authors: Maria Andrada Hamer; Per-Göran Larsson; Pia Teleman; Christina Eten Bergqvist; Jan Persson Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2012-06-16 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Blayne Welk; Kevin V Carlson; Richard J Baverstock; Stephen S Steele; Gregory G Bailly; Duane R Hickling Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Holly E Richter; Michael E Albo; Halina M Zyczynski; Kimberly Kenton; Peggy A Norton; Larry T Sirls; Stephen R Kraus; Toby C Chai; Gary E Lemack; Kimberly J Dandreo; R Edward Varner; Shawn Menefee; Chiara Ghetti; Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Salil Khandwala; Thomas A Rozanski; Harry Johnson; Joseph Schaffer; Anne M Stoddard; Robert L Holley; Charles W Nager; Pamela Moalli; Elizabeth Mueller; Amy M Arisco; Marlene Corton; Sharon Tennstedt; T Debuene Chang; E Ann Gormley; Heather J Litman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 14.432