Literature DB >> 18801460

DNA repair and chromosomal alterations.

Adayapalam T Natarajan1, Fabrizio Palitti.   

Abstract

All mutagenic agents induce lesions in the cellular DNA and they are repaired efficiently by different repair mechanisms. Un-repaired and mis-repaired lesions lead to chromosomal aberrations (CAs). Depending upon the mutagenic agents involved, different DNA repair pathways, such as nucleotide excision repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination repair (HRR), cross-link repair (FANC), single strand annealing (SSA) etc., are operative. Following ionising radiation, DNA double strand breaks (DSBs, which are considered to be the most important leasion leading to observed biological effects) are repaired either by NHEJ and/or HRR. We have investigated the relative role of these two repair pathways leading to chromosomal aberrations using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) mutant cells deficient in one of these two repair pathwatys. NHEJ operates both in G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle, wheras HHR operates mainly in S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. In NHEJ-deficient mutant cells irradiated in G1, un-repaired double strand breaks reaching S phase are repaired (unexpectedly with a large mis-repair component) by HRR. In HRR-deficient mutant cells, un-repaired DSBs reaching S phase are repaired by NHEJ (unexpectedly with a low mis-repair component) as evidenced by the frequencies of chromatid type aberrations. Employing a similar approach, following treatment with benzo(alpha)pyrene-7,8diol-9,10epoxide (BPDE), the active metabolite of benzo(alpha)pyrene, NER and HRR seem to be the most important repair pathways protecting against chromosomal damage induced by this agent. In the case of acetaldehyde, (primary metabolite of alcohol in vivo) a DNA cross-linking agent, HRR and FANC pathways are important for protection against damage induced by this agent. Irrespective of the type of DNA lesions induced, ultimately they have to be converted to DSBs in order to give rise to CA. Therefore, both NHEJ and HRR are also involved to some extent in the origin of CA following treatment with S-dependent agents.The relative importance of different repair pathways in bestowing protection against DNA damage leading to chromosomal alterations is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18801460     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  23 in total

1.  Lack of association between GSTT1 polymorphism and endogenous or benzo[a]pyrene-induced sister chromatid exchanges as analyzed in metaphase or G2-phase lymphocytes.

Authors:  V I Hatzi; G I Terzoudi; C Stavropoulou; S I Malik; V Makropoulos; G E Pantelias
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  DNA damage and repair of human skin keratinocytes concurrently exposed to pyrene derivatives and UVA light.

Authors:  Tracie Perkins Fullove; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Irradiated esophageal cells are protected from radiation-induced recombination by MnSOD gene therapy.

Authors:  Yunyun Niu; Hong Wang; Dominika Wiktor-Brown; Rebecca Rugo; Hongmei Shen; M Saiful Huq; Bevin Engelward; Michael Epperly; Joel S Greenberger
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Widespread genomic instability mediated by a pathway involving glycoprotein Ib alpha and Aurora B kinase.

Authors:  Youjun Li; Fengfeng L Xu; Jie Lu; William S Saunders; Edward V Prochownik
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Adenomatous polyposis coli-mediated accumulation of abasic DNA lesions lead to cigarette smoke condensate-induced neoplastic transformation of normal breast epithelial cells.

Authors:  Aruna S Jaiswal; Harekrushna Panda; Christine A Pampo; Dietmar W Siemann; C Gary Gairola; Robert Hromas; Satya Narayan
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  Positioning effects of KillerRed inside of cells correlate with DNA strand breaks after activation with visible light.

Authors:  Waldemar Waldeck; Gabriele Mueller; Manfred Wiessler; Katalin Tóth; Klaus Braun
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 7.  MicroRNAs in the DNA Damage/Repair Network and Cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Tessitore; Germana Cicciarelli; Filippo Del Vecchio; Agata Gaggiano; Daniela Verzella; Mariafausta Fischietti; Davide Vecchiotti; Daria Capece; Francesca Zazzeroni; Edoardo Alesse
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.326

8.  DNA Repair Gene Polymorphisms and Chromosomal Aberrations in Exposed Populations.

Authors:  Yasmeen Niazi; Hauke Thomsen; Bozena Smolkova; Ludmila Vodickova; Sona Vodenkova; Michal Kroupa; Veronika Vymetalkova; Alena Kazimirova; Magdalena Barancokova; Katarina Volkovova; Marta Staruchova; Per Hoffmann; Markus M Nöthen; Maria Dusinska; Ludovit Musak; Pavel Vodicka; Kari Hemminki; Asta Försti
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Genome-Wide Functional and Stress Response Profiling Reveals Toxic Mechanism and Genes Required for Tolerance to Benzo[a]pyrene in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sean Timothy Francis O'Connor; Jiaqi Lan; Matthew North; Alexandre Loguinov; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith; April Z Gu; Chris Vulpe
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  The role of BRCA1 in homologous recombination repair in response to replication stress: significance in tumorigenesis and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Junran Zhang
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 7.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.