Literature DB >> 18799681

Evaluating the negative or valuing the positive? Neural mechanisms supporting feedback-based learning across development.

Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde1, Kiki Zanolie, Serge A R B Rombouts, Maartje E J Raijmakers, Eveline A Crone.   

Abstract

How children learn from positive and negative performance feedback lies at the foundation of successful learning and is therefore of great importance for educational practice. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the neural developmental changes related to feedback-based learning when performing a rule search and application task. Behavioral results from three age groups (8-9, 11-13, and 18-25 years of age) demonstrated that, compared with adults, 8- to 9-year-old children performed disproportionally more inaccurately after receiving negative feedback relative to positive feedback. Additionally, imaging data pointed toward a qualitative difference in how children and adults use performance feedback. That is, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and superior parietal cortex were more active after negative feedback for adults, but after positive feedback for children (8-9 years of age). For 11- to 13-year-olds, these regions did not show differential feedback sensitivity, suggesting that the transition occurs around this age. Pre-supplementary motor area/anterior cingulate cortex, in contrast, was more active after negative feedback in both 11- to 13-year-olds and adults, but not 8- to 9-year-olds. Together, the current data show that cognitive control areas are differentially engaged during feedback-based learning across development. Adults engage these regions after signals of response adjustment (i.e., negative feedback). Young children engage these regions after signals of response continuation (i.e., positive feedback). The neural activation patterns found in 11- to 13-year-olds indicate a transition around this age toward an increased influence of negative feedback on performance adjustment. This is the first developmental fMRI study to compare qualitative changes in brain activation during feedback learning across distinct stages of development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18799681      PMCID: PMC6671119          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1485-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  69 in total

1.  Preliminary findings: neural responses to feedback regarding betrayal and cooperation in adolescent anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Erin B McClure-Tone; Norberto E Nawa; Eric E Nelson; Allison M Detloff; Stephen J Fromm; Daniel S Pine; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Brain function during probabilistic learning in relation to IQ and level of education.

Authors:  Wouter van den Bos; Eveline A Crone; Berna Güroğlu
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 6.464

3.  [fMRI and DTI in delayed development of number processing].

Authors:  C M Krick; A Neuhaus; C Klewin; T Wörner; S Kreis; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Learning, worsening, and generalization in response to auditory perceptual training during adolescence.

Authors:  Julia Jones Huyck; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Striatum-medial prefrontal cortex connectivity predicts developmental changes in reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Wouter van den Bos; Michael X Cohen; Thorsten Kahnt; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Adolescent-specific patterns of behavior and neural activity during social reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Rebecca M Jones; Leah H Somerville; Jian Li; Erika J Ruberry; Alisa Powers; Natasha Mehta; Jonathan Dyke; B J Casey
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Dissociating the contributions of independent corticostriatal systems to visual categorization learning through the use of reinforcement learning modeling and Granger causality modeling.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Erik J Peterson; Corinna M Cincotta; Dan Lopez-Paniagua; Charles W Anderson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A neuroscience perspective on sexual risk behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Victor; Ahmad R Hariri
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2015-11-27

9.  Better than expected or as bad as you thought? The neurocognitive development of probabilistic feedback processing.

Authors:  Wouter van den Bos; Berna Güroğlu; Bianca G van den Bulk; Serge A R B Rombouts; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Evaluating self-generated decisions in frontal pole cortex of monkeys.

Authors:  Satoshi Tsujimoto; Aldo Genovesio; Steven P Wise
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.