Literature DB >> 18799444

Outcomes in adults with bicuspid aortic valves.

Nikolaos Tzemos1, Judith Therrien, James Yip, George Thanassoulis, Sonia Tremblay, Michal T Jamorski, Gary D Webb, Samuel C Siu.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common congenital cardiac anomaly in the adult population. Cardiac outcomes in a contemporary population of adults with bicuspid aortic valve have not been systematically determined.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and predictors of cardiac outcomes in a large consecutive series of adults with bicuspid aortic valve. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort study examining cardiac outcomes in 642 consecutive ambulatory adults (mean [SD] age, 35 [16] years; 68% male) with bicuspid aortic valve presenting to a Canadian congenital cardiac center from 1994 through 2001 and followed up for a mean (SD) period of 9 (5) years. Frequency and predictors of major cardiac events were determined by multivariate analysis. Mortality rate in the study group was compared with age- and sex-matched population estimates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality and cause of death were determined. Primary cardiac events were defined as the occurrence of any of the following complications: cardiac death, intervention on the aortic valve or ascending aorta, aortic dissection or aneurysm, or congestive heart failure requiring hospital admission during the follow-up period.
RESULTS: During the follow-up period, there were 28 deaths (mean [SD], 4% [1%]). One or more primary cardiac events occurred in 161 patients (mean [SD], 25% [2%]), which included cardiac death in 17 patients (mean [SD], 3% [1%]), intervention on aortic valve or ascending aorta in 142 patients (mean [SD], 22% [2%]), aortic dissection or aneurysm in 11 patients (mean [SD], 2% [1%]), or congestive heart failure requiring hospital admission in 16 patients (mean [SD], 2% [1%]). Independent predictors of primary cardiac events were age older than 30 years (hazard ratio [HR], 3.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.15-4.19; P<.001), moderate or severe aortic stenosis (HR, 5.67; 95% CI, 4.16-7.80; P<.001), and moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (HR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.93-3.76; P<.001). The 10-year survival rate of the study group (mean [SD], 96% [1%]) was not significantly different from population estimates (mean [SD], 97% [1%]; P = .71). At last follow-up, 280 patients (mean [SD], 45% [2%]) had dilated aortic sinus and/or ascending aorta.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study population of young adults with bicuspid aortic valve, age, severity of aortic stenosis, and severity of aortic regurgitation were independently associated with primary cardiac events. Over the mean follow-up duration of 9 years, survival rates were not lower than for the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18799444     DOI: 10.1001/jama.300.11.1317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  133 in total

1.  [MRI for therapy control in patients with aortic isthmus stenosis].

Authors:  B J Wintersperger; D Theisen; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Management of patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Todd L Kiefer; Andrew Wang; G Chad Hughes; Thomas M Bashore
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-12

Review 3.  Bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Katie L Losenno; Michael W A Chu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Impact of asymmetry on measurements of the aortic root using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Felipe S Torres; Jonathan D Windram; Timothy J Bradley; Bernd J Wintersperger; Ravi Menezes; Andrew M Crean; Jack M Colman; Candice K Silversides; Rachel M Wald
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  The genetic and molecular basis of bicuspid aortic valve associated thoracic aortopathy: a link to phenotype heterogeneity.

Authors:  Ratnasari Padang; Paul G Bannon; Richmond Jeremy; David R Richmond; Christopher Semsarian; Michael Vallely; Michael Wilson; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

6.  Factors affecting a dilated ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: the relevance of valve anatomy, body size and age.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nishi; Taichi Sakaguchi; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Daisuke Yoshioka; Takayoshi Ueno; Toru Kuratani; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Bicuspid aortic valve syndrome: a multidisciplinary approach for a complex entity.

Authors:  María Martín; Rebeca Lorca; José Rozado; Rubén Alvarez-Cabo; Juan Calvo; Isaac Pascual; Helena Cigarrán; Isabel Rodríguez; César Morís
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Thoracic aorta 3D hemodynamics in pediatric and young adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Bradley D Allen; Pim van Ooij; Alex J Barker; Maria Carr; Maya Gabbour; Susanne Schnell; Kelly B Jarvis; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Cynthia Rigsby; Joshua D Robinson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Impact of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology on Aortic Valve Disease and Aortic Dilation in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Rebekah M Ward; Jordan M Marsh; Jeffrey M Gossett; Mallikarjuna R Rettiganti; R Thomas Collins
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  Combination of a Giant Dissected Ascending Aortic Aneurysm with Multiple Fistulae into the Cardiac Chambers Caused by Prosthetic Aortic Valve Endocarditis.

Authors:  Feridoun Sabzi; Reza Faraji
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2016-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.