Literature DB >> 18798860

Intraspecific chromosome number variation: a neglected threat to the conservation of rare plants.

Paul M Severns1, Aaron Liston.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of rare plant conservation will increase when life history, demographic, and genetic data are considered simultaneously. Inbreeding depression is a widely recognized genetic concern in rare plant conservation, and the mixing of genetically diverse populations in restoration efforts is a common remedy. Nevertheless, if populations with unrecognized intraspecific chromosome variation are crossed, progeny fitness losses will range from partial to complete sterility, and reintroductions and population augmentation of rare plants may fail. To assess the current state of cytological knowledge of threatened and endangered plants in the continental United States, we searched available resources for chromosome counts. We also reviewed recovery plans to discern whether recovery criteria potentially place listed species at risk by requiring reintroductions or population augmentation in the absence of cytological information. Over half the plants lacked a chromosome count, and when a taxon did have a count it generally originated from a sampling intensity too limited to detect intraspecific chromosome variation. Despite limited past cytological sampling, we found 11 plants with documented intraspecific cytological variation, while 8 others were ambiguous for intraspecific chromosome variation. Nevertheless, only one recovery plan addressed the chromosome differences. Inadequate within-species cytological characterization, incomplete sampling among listed taxa, and the prevalence of interspecific and intraspecific chromosome variation in listed genera, suggests that other rare plants are likely to have intraspecific chromosome variation. Nearly 90% of all recovery plans called for reintroductions or population augmentation as part of recovery criteria despite the dearth of cytological knowledge. We recommend screening rare plants for intraspecific chromosome variation before reintroductions or population augmentation projects are undertaken to safeguard against inadvertent mixtures of incompatible cytotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18798860     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01058.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  9 in total

Review 1.  Ecological studies of polyploidy in the 100 years following its discovery.

Authors:  Justin Ramsey; Tara S Ramsey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Influence of polyploidy on insect herbivores of native and invasive genotypes of Solidago gigantea (Asteraceae).

Authors:  Helen M Hull-Sanders; Robert H Johnson; Heather A Owen; Gretchen A Meyer
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-09

3.  Karyotype diversity of pseudoscorpions of the genus Chthonius (Pseudoscorpiones, Chthoniidae) in the Alps.

Authors:  Jana Kotrbová; Vera Opatova; Giulio Gardini; František Šťáhlavský
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.800

4.  Detecting Mechanisms of Karyotype Evolution in Heterotaxis (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Ana Paula Moraes; André Olmos Simões; Dario Isidro Ojeda Alayon; Fábio de Barros; Eliana Regina Forni-Martins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Empirical evidence of fixed and homeostatic patterns of polyploid advantage in a keystone grass exposed to drought and heat stress.

Authors:  Robert C Godfree; David J Marshall; Andrew G Young; Cathy H Miller; Sarah Mathews
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Genetic rescue in a plant polyploid complex: Case study on the importance of genetic and trait data for conservation management.

Authors:  Alexander N Schmidt-Lebuhn; David J Marshall; Brad Dreis; Andrew G Young
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Pollinator assemblage and pollen load differences on sympatric diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of the desert-dominant Larrea tridentata.

Authors:  Robert G Laport; Robert L Minckley; Diana Pilson
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Evolutionary importance of the relationship between cytogeography and climate: New insights on creosote bushes from North and South America.

Authors:  Romina Vidal-Russell; Mariana Tadey; Romana Urfusová; Tomáš Urfus; Cintia Paola Souto
Journal:  Plant Divers       Date:  2021-11-30

9.  Habitat specificity of a threatened and endemic, cliff-dwelling halophyte.

Authors:  Ana D Caperta; M Dalila Espírito-Santo; Vasco Silva; Ana Ferreira; Ana P Paes; Ana S Róis; José C Costa; Pedro Arsénio
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.276

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.