INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter-free LBO laser PVP for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We prospectively evaluated our initial LBO laser PVP experience and the need for urethral catheterization. RESULTS: Seventy consecutive patients were identified. 49 (70%) were discharged without (C-) and 21 (30%) were discharged with (C+) a urethral catheter. There were no significant differences in pre-operative parameters, including age (C-: 65+/-10 vs. C+: 69+/-9 years), AUASS (C-: 22+/-6 vs. C+: 21+/-6), Qmax (C-: 10+/-4 vs. C+: 8+/-3 ml/second), PVR (C-: 62+/-105 vs. C+: 57+/-82 ml) and prostate volume (C-: 65+/-35 vs. C+: 86+/-53 ml). There were no significant differences in laser time and energy usage. AUASS, Qmax and PVR values showed significant improvement within each group (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups. All were outpatient procedures. 2/70 (2.9%) patients required catheter reinsertion in C+. The overall incidence of adverse events was low and did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that catheter-free LBO laser PVP is safe and effective for the treatment of LUTS secondary to BPH. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter-free LBO laser PVP for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We prospectively evaluated our initial LBO laser PVP experience and the need for urethral catheterization. RESULTS: Seventy consecutive patients were identified. 49 (70%) were discharged without (C-) and 21 (30%) were discharged with (C+) a urethral catheter. There were no significant differences in pre-operative parameters, including age (C-: 65+/-10 vs. C+: 69+/-9 years), AUASS (C-: 22+/-6 vs. C+: 21+/-6), Qmax (C-: 10+/-4 vs. C+: 8+/-3 ml/second), PVR (C-: 62+/-105 vs. C+: 57+/-82 ml) and prostate volume (C-: 65+/-35 vs. C+: 86+/-53 ml). There were no significant differences in laser time and energy usage. AUASS, Qmax and PVR values showed significant improvement within each group (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups. All were outpatient procedures. 2/70 (2.9%) patients required catheter reinsertion in C+. The overall incidence of adverse events was low and did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that catheter-free LBO laser PVP is safe and effective for the treatment of LUTS secondary to BPH. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Michael K Brawer; Danil V Makarov; Alan W Partin; Claus G Roehrborn; J Curtis Nickel; Shing-Hwa Lu; Naoki Yoshimura; Michael B Chancellor; Dean G Assimos Journal: Rev Urol Date: 2008