Literature DB >> 18798265

Defining the molecular action of HDAC inhibitors and synergism with androgen deprivation in ERG-positive prostate cancer.

Mari Björkman1, Kristiina Iljin, Pasi Halonen, Henri Sara, Elisa Kaivanto, Matthias Nees, Olli P Kallioniemi.   

Abstract

Gene fusions between prostate-specific, androgen responsive TMPRSS2 gene and oncogenic ETS factors, such as ERG, occur in up to 50% of all prostate cancers. We recently defined a gene signature that was characteristic to prostate cancers with ERG activation. This suggested epigenetic reprogramming, such as upregulation of histone deactylase 1 (HDAC1) gene and downregulation of its target genes. We then hypothesized that patients with ERG-positive prostate cancers may benefit from epigenetic therapy such as HDAC inhibition (HDACi), especially in combination with antiandrogens. Here, we exposed ERG-positive prostate cancer cell lines to HDAC inhibitors Trichostatin A (TSA), MS-275 and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) with or without androgen deprivation. We explored the effects on cell phenotype, gene expression as well as ERG and androgen receptor (AR) signaling. When compared with 5 other prostate cell lines, ERG-positive VCaP and DuCap cells were extremely sensitive to HDACi, in particular TSA, showing synergy with concomitant androgen deprivation increasing apoptosis. Both of the HDAC inhibitors studied caused repression of the ERG-fusion gene, whereas the pan-HDAC inhibitor TSA prominently repressed the ERG-associated gene signature. Additionally, HDACi and flutamide caused retention of AR in the cytoplasm, indicating blockage of androgen signaling. Our results support the hypothesis that HDACi, especially in combination with androgen deprivation, is effective against TMPRSS2-ERG-fusion positive prostate cancer in vitro. Together with our previous in vivo observations of an "epigenetic reprogramming gene signature" in clinical ERG-positive prostate cancers, these studies provide mechanistic insights to ERG-associated tumorigenesis and suggest therapeutic paradigms to be tested in vivo. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18798265     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  28 in total

1.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors, valproic acid and trichostatin-A induce apoptosis and affect acetylation status of p53 in ERG-positive prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Wendell S Fortson; Shubhalaxmi Kayarthodi; Yasuo Fujimura; Huali Xu; Roland Matthews; William E Grizzle; Veena N Rao; Ganapathy K Bhat; E Shyam P Reddy
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 5.650

2.  A transcriptional repressor co-regulatory network governing androgen response in prostate cancers.

Authors:  Kern Rei Chng; Cheng Wei Chang; Si Kee Tan; Chong Yang; Shu Zhen Hong; Noel Yan Wei Sng; Edwin Cheung
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Molecular subtyping of primary prostate cancer reveals specific and shared target genes of different ETS rearrangements.

Authors:  Paula Paulo; Franclim R Ribeiro; Joana Santos; Diana Mesquita; Mafalda Almeida; João D Barros-Silva; Harri Itkonen; Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo; Anita Sveen; Ian G Mills; Rolf I Skotheim; Ragnhild A Lothe; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.715

4.  The prostate cancer blocking potential of the histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 is not enhanced by the multi receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor TKI258.

Authors:  Stefan Vallo; Jens Mani; Matthias Stastny; Jasmina Makarević; Eva Juengel; Igor Tsaur; Georg Bartsch; Axel Haferkamp; Roman A Blaheta
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 5.  Rational therapeutic combinations with histone deacetylase inhibitors for the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  K Ted Thurn; Scott Thomas; Amy Moore; Pamela N Munster
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 6.  Predicting response to hormonal therapy and survival in men with hormone sensitive metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Petros D Grivas; Diane M Robins; Maha Hussain
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 7.  The oncogene ERG: a key factor in prostate cancer.

Authors:  P Adamo; M R Ladomery
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Comparative analyses of chromosome alterations in soft-tissue metastases within and across patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ilona N Holcomb; Janet M Young; Ilsa M Coleman; Keyan Salari; Douglas I Grove; Li Hsu; Lawrence D True; Martine P Roudier; Colm M Morrissey; Celestia S Higano; Peter S Nelson; Robert L Vessella; Barbara J Trask
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  A comprehensive panel of three-dimensional models for studies of prostate cancer growth, invasion and drug responses.

Authors:  Ville Härmä; Johannes Virtanen; Rami Mäkelä; Antti Happonen; John-Patrick Mpindi; Matias Knuuttila; Pekka Kohonen; Jyrki Lötjönen; Olli Kallioniemi; Matthias Nees
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Oxidative stress and DNA methylation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Krishna Vanaja Donkena; Charles Y F Young; Donald J Tindall
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.