Literature DB >> 18797842

[Aspiration of joint fluid for detection of the pathogen in periprosthetic infection].

L Frommelt1.   

Abstract

Periprosthetic infection is a rare but severe complication of a frequently performed procedure. The diagnosis of this mostly chronic infection is difficult due to the absence of classic signs of infection in one-third of the cases. In this context, periprosthetic infection may be proven by detecting the bacterial pathogen. Aspiration of joint fluid is a suitable method to obtain a representative specimen from the infection site. The puncture must be performed free of contamination, and microbiological processing must respect the special condition of these pathogens. For proof of infection in clinically doubtful cases, cytology of the joint fluid is useful. Aspiration of joint fluid is, apart from biopsy, one of the most important methods for detecting bacterial pathogens in periprosthetic infection. Cultural findings must be interpreted in the context of clinical, histomorphological, cytological, laboratory, and x-ray findings. If doubt remains, the diagnosis should be verified by repeated joint aspiration or by biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18797842     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-008-1345-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  9 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Poor predictive value of broad-range PCR for the detection of arthroplasty infection in 92 cases.

Authors:  Konstantinos Panousis; Peter Grigoris; Ian Butcher; Bardeep Rana; James H Reilly; David L Hamblen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 3.  Small colony variants: a pathogenic form of bacteria that facilitates persistent and recurrent infections.

Authors:  Richard A Proctor; Christof von Eiff; Barbara C Kahl; Karsten Becker; Peter McNamara; Mathias Herrmann; Georg Peters
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection.

Authors:  Andrej Trampuz; Kerryl E Piper; Melissa J Jacobson; Arlen D Hanssen; Krishnan K Unni; Douglas R Osmon; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Franklin R Cockerill; James M Steckelberg; James F Greenleaf; Robin Patel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements.

Authors:  B Fink; C Makowiak; M Fuerst; I Berger; P Schäfer; L Frommelt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07

Review 6.  [Treatment of periprosthetic infection of the hip using one-stage exchange surgery].

Authors:  K Steinbrink; L Frommelt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Pathogenesis of foreign body infection. Evidence for a local granulocyte defect.

Authors:  W Zimmerli; P D Lew; F A Waldvogel
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection.

Authors:  Andrej Trampuz; Arlen D Hanssen; Douglas R Osmon; Jayawant Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Effect of ultraclean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: a randomised study.

Authors:  O M Lidwell; E J Lowbury; W Whyte; R Blowers; S J Stanley; D Lowe
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-07-03
  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  [Periprosthetic infection after hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Winkler; A Trampuz; S Hardt; V Janz; C Kleber; C Perka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [One-stage revision of knee endoprosthesis due to periprosthetic infection and Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome].

Authors:  H-C Schmitz; B Schwantes; D Kendoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Evaluation of sonicate fluid cultures in comparison to histological analysis of the periprosthetic membrane for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Viktor Janz; Georgi I Wassilew; Olaf Hasart; Georg Matziolis; Stephan Tohtz; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  [Diagnosis and treatment of foreign-body-associated infection in orthopaedic surgery].

Authors:  L Frommelt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-09-06       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Is non-union of tibial shaft fractures due to nonculturable bacterial pathogens? A clinical investigation using PCR and culture techniques.

Authors:  Justus Gille; Steffen Wallstabe; Arndt-Peter Schulz; Andreas Paech; Ulf Gerlach
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  A model of implant-associated infection in the tibial metaphysis of rats.

Authors:  Maximilian Haenle; Carmen Zietz; Tobias Lindner; Kathleen Arndt; Anika Vetter; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Andreas Podbielski; Rainer Bader
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-12-08

7.  Rapid detection of periprosthetic joint infection using a combination of 16s rDNA polymerase chain reaction and lateral flow immunoassay: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  V Janz; J Schoon; C Morgenstern; B Preininger; S Reinke; G Duda; A Breitbach; C F Perka; S Geissler
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.853

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.