OBJECTIVE: Novel, inexpensive solutions are needed for improved management of vector-borne and other diseases in resource-poor environments. Emerging free software providing access to satellite imagery and simple editing tools (e.g. Google Earth) complement existing geographic information system (GIS) software and provide new opportunities for: (i) strengthening overall public health capacity through development of information for city infrastructures; and (ii) display of public health data directly on an image of the physical environment. METHODS: We used freely accessible satellite imagery and a set of feature-making tools included in the software (allowing for production of polygons, lines and points) to generate information for city infrastructure and to display disease data in a dengue decision support system (DDSS) framework. FINDINGS: Two cities in Mexico (Chetumal and Merida) were used to demonstrate that a basic representation of city infrastructure useful as a spatial backbone in a DDSS can be rapidly developed at minimal cost. Data layers generated included labelled polygons representing city blocks, lines representing streets, and points showing the locations of schools and health clinics. City blocks were colour-coded to show presence of dengue cases. The data layers were successfully imported in a format known as shapefile into a GIS software. CONCLUSION: The combination of Google Earth and free GIS software (e.g. HealthMapper, developed by WHO, and SIGEpi, developed by PAHO) has tremendous potential to strengthen overall public health capacity and facilitate decision support system approaches to prevention and control of vector-borne diseases in resource-poor environments.
OBJECTIVE: Novel, inexpensive solutions are needed for improved management of vector-borne and other diseases in resource-poor environments. Emerging free software providing access to satellite imagery and simple editing tools (e.g. Google Earth) complement existing geographic information system (GIS) software and provide new opportunities for: (i) strengthening overall public health capacity through development of information for city infrastructures; and (ii) display of public health data directly on an image of the physical environment. METHODS: We used freely accessible satellite imagery and a set of feature-making tools included in the software (allowing for production of polygons, lines and points) to generate information for city infrastructure and to display disease data in a dengue decision support system (DDSS) framework. FINDINGS: Two cities in Mexico (Chetumal and Merida) were used to demonstrate that a basic representation of city infrastructure useful as a spatial backbone in a DDSS can be rapidly developed at minimal cost. Data layers generated included labelled polygons representing city blocks, lines representing streets, and points showing the locations of schools and health clinics. City blocks were colour-coded to show presence of dengue cases. The data layers were successfully imported in a format known as shapefile into a GIS software. CONCLUSION: The combination of Google Earth and free GIS software (e.g. HealthMapper, developed by WHO, and SIGEpi, developed by PAHO) has tremendous potential to strengthen overall public health capacity and facilitate decision support system approaches to prevention and control of vector-borne diseases in resource-poor environments.
Authors: K Indaratna; R Hutubessy; S Chupraphawan; C Sukapurana; J Tao; S Chunsutthiwat; K Thimasarn; L Crissman Journal: Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 0.267
Authors: Juan E Hernández-Avila; Mario H Rodríguez; Angel F Betanzos-Reyes; Rogelio Danis-Lozano; Jorge F Méndez-Galván; Oscar J Velázquez-Monroy; Roberto Tapia-Conyer Journal: Salud Publica Mex Date: 2006 Sep-Oct
Authors: M Booman; D N Durrheim; K La Grange; C Martin; A M Mabuza; A Zitha; F M Mbokazi; C Fraser; B L Sharp Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2003-11-17 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Aruna Srivastava; B N Nagpal; Rekha Saxena; Alex Eapen; K John Ravindran; S K Subbarao; C Rajamanikam; M Palanisamy; N L Kalra; N C Appavoo Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Brian L Sharp; Immo Kleinschmidt; Elisabeth Streat; Rajendra Maharaj; Karen I Barnes; David N Durrheim; Frances C Ridl; Natasha Morris; Ishen Seocharan; Simon Kunene; Jacobus J P LA Grange; Jotham D Mthembu; Francois Maartens; Carrin L Martin; Avertino Barreto Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Anna M Winters; Rebecca J Eisen; Mark J Delorey; Marc Fischer; Roger S Nasci; Emily Zielinski-Gutierrez; Chester G Moore; W John Pape; Lars Eisen Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Saul Lozano-Fuentes; Fadi Wedyan; Edgar Hernandez-Garcia; Devadatta Sadhu; Sudipto Ghosh; James M Bieman; Diana Tep-Chel; Julián E García-Rejón; Lars Eisen Journal: J Med Entomol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.278
Authors: Simon I Hay; Marianne E Sinka; Robi M Okara; Caroline W Kabaria; Philip M Mbithi; Carolynn C Tago; David Benz; Peter W Gething; Rosalind E Howes; Anand P Patil; William H Temperley; Michael J Bangs; Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap; Iqbal R F Elyazar; Ralph E Harbach; Janet Hemingway; Sylvie Manguin; Charles M Mbogo; Yasmin Rubio-Palis; H Charles J Godfray Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-02-09 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Danielle F Haley; Stephen A Matthews; Hannah L F Cooper; Regine Haardörfer; Adaora A Adimora; Gina M Wingood; Michael R Kramer Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Aileen Y Chang; Maria E Parrales; Javier Jimenez; Magdalena E Sobieszczyk; Scott M Hammer; David J Copenhaver; Rajan P Kulkarni Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 3.918