Literature DB >> 18797359

Revision surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and outcome.

Beril Gok1, Daniel M Sciubba, Gregory S McLoughlin, Matthew McGirt, Selim Ayhan, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Ali Bydon, Ziya L Gokaslan, Timothy F Witham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The role of additional or revision surgery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is challenging. Postoperative pseudoarthrosis, instability, hardware failure, and recurrent cervical stenosis are conditions that require detailed clinical and radiographic assessment to define the pathology and assess the need for surgical decompression and fusion. The purpose of this study is to assess the neurological outcome, radiological outcome, and complications of patients undergoing additional or revision surgery for CSM.
METHODS: Between 2002 and 2006, 30 patients with CSM and postoperative pseudoarthrosis, instability, hardware failure, or recurrent stenosis underwent surgical decompression and stabilization. The specific procedure was selected according to each patient's medical condition, cervical sagittal alignment, and extent of stenosis. All patients underwent an anterior, posterior, or combined anterior and posterior decompression and instrumented fusion. The charts of these patients were reviewed to assess neurological and radiographic outcomes.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (83%) improved postoperatively as measured by the Nurick Myelopathy Scale over a mean follow-up period of 19 months (range, 2-64 mo). The overall complication rate was 27%, consisting of transient monoradiculopathy (7%), dysphagia (10%), and infection (7%). The incidence of nonunion during the follow-up period was 3%.
CONCLUSION: Although patients with CSM and postoperative pseudoarthrosis, instability, hardware failure, or junctional stenosis who require revision surgery may risk a substantial likelihood of surgical complications (25% in this series), a significant proportion of patients may experience improved neurological outcomes. In our experience, the cervical sagittal alignment and the extent of stenosis are critical factors to consider when selecting the eventual procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18797359     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000320441.86936.99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  6 in total

1.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years.

Authors:  Zdeněk Kadaňka; Josef Bednařík; Oldřich Novotný; Igor Urbánek; Ladislav Dušek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Correlation between the clinic and the index of cervical myelopathy Torg.

Authors:  Agnaldo Rogério Lozorio; Mateus Borges; José Lucas Batista Junior; Charbel Chacob Junior; Igor Cardoso Machado; Rodrigo Rezende
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.513

3.  Open Door Laminoplasty: Creation Of A New Vertebral Arch.

Authors:  Monica Lara-Almunia; Javier Hernandez-Vicente
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-02-09

Review 4.  Severe dysphagia secondary to posterior C1-C3 instrumentation in a patient with atlantoaxial traumatic injury: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Oren N Gottfried; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ibrahim Omeis
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Surgical and general complications in 2,961 Japanese patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Comparison of different age groups.

Authors:  Yasuaki Imajo; Toshihiko Taguchi; Masashi Neo; Koji Otani; Tadanori Ogata; Hiroshi Ozawa; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Hideki Murakami; Tetsuhiro Iguchi
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-20

6.  Longitudinal Spinous-Splitting Laminoplasty with Coral Bone for the Treatment of Cervical Adjacent Segment Degenerative Disease: A 5-Year Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Wei He; Da He; Qi-Long Wang; Wei Tian; Bo Liu; Ya-Jun Liu; Yu-Qing Sun; Yong-Gang Xing; Ning Yuan; Qiang Yuan; Bin Xiao; Bing Han; Yu-Mei Wang; Teng-Fei Ma; Ming-Ming Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.