Literature DB >> 18796500

Does an expansion in private sector contraceptive supply increase inequality in modern contraceptive use?

Sohail Agha1, Mai Do.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an expansion in private sector contraceptive supply is associated with increased socio-economic inequality in the modern contraceptive prevalence rate (MCPR inequality).
METHODS: Multiple rounds of Demographic and Health Surveys data were analysed for five countries that experienced an increase in the private sector supply of contraceptives: Morocco, Indonesia, Kenya, Ghana and Bangladesh. Information on household assets and amenities was used to construct wealth quintiles. A concentration index, which calculates the degree of inequality in contraceptive use by wealth, was calculated for each survey round.
RESULTS: Socio-economic inequality in the MCPR (MCPR inequality) declined in Morocco and Indonesia, where substantial expansion in private sector contraceptive supply occurred. In both countries, poor women continued to rely heavily on contraceptives supplied by the public sector even as they increased use of contraceptives obtained from the private sector. A marginally significant decline in MCPR inequality occurred in Bangladesh, where the increase in private sector supply was modest. There was no significant overall change in MCPR inequality in Kenya or Ghana. In Kenya, this lack of significant overall change disguised trends moving in opposite directions in urban and rural areas. In urban Kenya, MCPR inequality declined as low-income urban women increased use of contraceptives obtained primarily from the public sector. In rural Kenya, MCPR inequality increased. This increase was associated with a decline in the supply of contraceptives by the public sector and non-governmental organizations to the poorest, rural, women.
CONCLUSIONS: The study found no support for the hypothesis that an increase in private sector contraceptive supply leads to higher MCPR inequality. The findings suggest that continued public sector supply of contraceptives to the poorest women protects against increased MCPR inequality. The study highlights the role of the public sector in building contraceptive markets for the private sector to exploit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18796500     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czn035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  11 in total

1.  Equity monitoring for social marketing: use of wealth quintiles and the concentration index for decision making in HIV prevention, family planning, and malaria programs.

Authors:  Nirali M Chakraborty; Rebecca Firestone; Nicole Bellows
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Effect of an expansion in private sector provision of contraceptive supplies on horizontal inequity in modern contraceptive use: evidence from Africa and Asia.

Authors:  David R Hotchkiss; Deepali Godha; Mai Do
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2011-08-19

Review 3.  Comparative performance of private and public healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sanjay Basu; Jason Andrews; Sandeep Kishore; Rajesh Panjabi; David Stuckler
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Potential collaboration with the private sector for the provision of ambulatory care in the Mekong region, Vietnam.

Authors:  Ha Anh Duc; Lora L Sabin; Le Quang Cuong; Duong Duc Thien; Rich Feeley
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  Why do women choose private over public facilities for family planning services? A qualitative study of post-partum women in an informal urban settlement in Kenya.

Authors:  Sirina R Keesara; Pamela A Juma; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Using multi-country household surveys to understand who provides reproductive and maternal health services in low- and middle-income countries: a critical appraisal of the Demographic and Health Surveys.

Authors:  K Footman; L Benova; C Goodman; D Macleod; C A Lynch; L Penn-Kekana; O M R Campbell
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Self care interventions for sexual and reproductive health and rights: costs, benefits, and financing.

Authors:  Michelle Remme; Manjulaa Narasimhan; David Wilson; Moazzam Ali; Lavanya Vijayasingham; Fatima Ghani; Pascale Allotey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-04-01

8.  Expansion in the private sector provision of institutional delivery services and horizontal equity: evidence from Nepal and Bangladesh.

Authors:  David R Hotchkiss; Deepali Godha; Mai Do
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.344

9.  Socio-demographic and economic inequalities in modern contraception in 11 low- and middle-income countries: an analysis of the PMA2020 surveys.

Authors:  Cauane Blumenberg; Franciele Hellwig; Fernanda Ewerling; Aluísio J D Barros
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 10.  Meeting need vs. sharing the market: a systematic review of methods to measure the use of private sector family planning and childbirth services in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Mardieh L Dennis; Lenka Benova; Onikepe O Owolabi; Oona M R Campbell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.