Literature DB >> 1879631

Impact of the small bowel study on patient management.

M Y Chen1, D J Ott, T F Kelley, D W Gelfand.   

Abstract

Medical records of 528 consecutive patients who had a peroral small bowel examination or enteroclysis were reviewed. Clinical indications, efficacy of the small bowel examinations, and patient outcome were correlated to determine the impact of the small bowel examination on patient management. The most frequent indications were abdominal pain (19%), diarrhea (15%), obstruction (12%), bleeding (11%), postsurgical evaluation (10%), and assessment of Crohn's disease (8%). Two thirds of the studies (67%) were normal, and 33% of the examinations were abnormal, with similar results in all age groups. Small bowel obstruction (13%), miscellaneous results primarily including diffuse small bowel diseases (7%), adhesions (6%), and Crohn's disease (5%) were the most common abnormalities detected. The effects of small bowel studies on patient management were exclusion of serious pathology (67%), diagnosis that changed therapy (32%), and incidental findings (1%). Small bowel enteroclysis had a higher yield of positive examinations than the peroral small bowel examination, most likely due to patient selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1879631     DOI: 10.1007/bf01887343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  10 in total

1.  The effectiveness of the incidental small-bowel series.

Authors:  A M Fried; A Poulos; D R Hatfield
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Lesions missed on small-bowel follow-through: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  D D Maglinte; B T Burney; R E Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  An evaluation of the small bowell enema based on an analysis of 350 consecutive examinations.

Authors:  R Vallance
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Efficacy study of the small-bowel examination.

Authors:  F E Rabe; G J Becker; M J Besozzi; R E Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Barium/air double contrast examination of the small bowel in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  O Ekberg
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1984-04

6.  Detailed per-oral small bowel examination vs. enteroclysis. Part I: Expenditures and radiation exposure.

Authors:  D J Ott; Y M Chen; D W Gelfand; F Van Swearingen; H A Munitz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Small-bowel enema in the diagnosis of adhesive obstructions.

Authors:  D F Caroline; H Herlinger; I Laufer; H Y Kressel; M S Levine
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage of small-bowel origin.

Authors:  C A Briley; D C Jackson; I S Johnsrude; S R Mills
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Predictive value of small bowel radiography for recurrent Crohn Disease.

Authors:  O Ekberg; F T Fork; J Hildell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  How and when to use barium for diagnosis of small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  S Y Han; H L Laws; J S Aldrete
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 0.954

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal radiology: current indications and referral patterns.

Authors:  D M Einstein; J M Lieberman; D M Paushter; W A Chilcote; R Yagan; A L Desberg; A O Motta
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1993
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.