Literature DB >> 18795941

Age-specific interval breast cancers in Japan: estimation of the proper sensitivity of screening using a population-based cancer registry.

Akihiko Suzuki1, Shinichi Kuriyama, Masaaki Kawai, Masakazu Amari, Motohiro Takeda, Takanori Ishida, Koji Ohnuki, Yoshikazu Nishino, Ichiro Tsuji, Daisuke Shibuya, Noriaki Ohuchi.   

Abstract

The age-specific sensitivity of a screening program was investigated using a population-based cancer registry as a source of false-negative cancer cases. A population-based screening program for breast cancer was run using either clinical breast examinations (CBE) alone or mammography combined with CBE in the Miyagi Prefecture from 1997 to 2002. Interval cancers were newly identified by linking the screening records to the population-based cancer registry to estimate the number of false-negative cases of screening program. Among 112 071 women screened by mammography combined with CBE, the number of detected cancers, false-negative cases and the sensitivity were 289, 22 and 92.9%, respectively, based on the reports from participating municipalities. The number of newly found false-negative cases and corrected sensitivity when using the registry were 34 and 83.8%, respectively. In detected cancers, the sensitivity of screening by mammography combined with CBE in women ranging from 40 to 49 years of age based on a population-based cancer registry was much lower than that in women 50-59 and 60-69 years of age (40-49: 18, 71.4%, 50-59: 19, 85.8%, 60-69: 19, 87.2%). These data suggest that the accurate outcome of an evaluation of breast cancer screening must include the use of a population-based cancer registry for detecting false-negative cases. Screening by mammography combined with CBE may therefore not be sufficiently sensitive for women ranging from 40 to 49 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18795941     DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00926.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Sci        ISSN: 1347-9032            Impact factor:   6.716


  10 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals: use of record linkage from the Osaka Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Tami Sengoku; Kaname Matsumura; Masahisa Usami; Yoshimitsu Takahashi; Takeo Nakayama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Impact of childbirth history on dense breast in mammographic screening: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tomohiro Ochi; Hiroko Tsunoda; Hideko Yamauchi; Osamu Takahashi
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Portable impulse-radar detector for breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shinsuke Sasada; Norio Masumoto; Hang Song; Keiko Kajitani; Akiko Emi; Takayuki Kadoya; Koji Arihiro; Takamaro Kikkawa; Morihito Okada
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-06-13

4.  Randomized controlled trial on effectiveness of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-49 (J-START): research design.

Authors:  Noriaki Ohuchi; Takanori Ishida; Masaaki Kawai; Yoko Narikawa; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Tomotaka Sobue
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Circulating cell-free DNA-based epigenetic assay can detect early breast cancer.

Authors:  Natsue Uehiro; Fumiaki Sato; Fengling Pu; Sunao Tanaka; Masahiro Kawashima; Kosuke Kawaguchi; Masahiro Sugimoto; Shigehira Saji; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.

Authors:  Eun Hye Lee; Keum Won Kim; Young Joong Kim; Dong-Rock Shin; Young Mi Park; Hyo Soon Lim; Jeong Seon Park; Hye-Won Kim; You Me Kim; Hye Jung Kim; Jae Kwan Jun
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening using mammography in Vietnamese women.

Authors:  Chi Phuong Nguyen; Eddy M M Adang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An analysis of mass screening strategies using a mathematical model: comparison of breast cancer screening in Japan and the United States.

Authors:  Miwako Tsunematsu; Masayuki Kakehashi
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.211

9.  Analysis of Participant Factors That Affect the Diagnostic Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.

Authors:  Young Joong Kim; Eun Hye Lee; Jae Kwan Jun; Dong-Rock Shin; Young Mi Park; Hye-Won Kim; Youme Kim; Keum Won Kim; Hyo Soon Lim; Jeong Seon Park; Hye Jung Kim; Hye-Mi Jo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Metastatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the breast presenting with pericardial effusion-Challenges in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael Chahin; Karan Seegobin; Satish Maharaj; Karishma Ramsubeik
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-10-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.