Literature DB >> 18795840

A comparison of murine smooth muscle cells generated from embryonic versus induced pluripotent stem cells.

Chang-Qing Xie1, Huarong Huang, Sheng Wei, Long-Sheng Song, Jifeng Zhang, Raquel P Ritchie, Liangbiao Chen, Ming Zhang, Y Eugene Chen.   

Abstract

Smooth muscle cell (SMC) differentiation and dedifferentiation play a critical role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. The lack of a good and simple in vitro SMC differentiation system has hampered the progress of SMC field for years. The generation of such an in vitro system would be invaluable for exploring molecular mechanisms of SMC differentiation and dedifferentiation. Recently, the establishment of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells has offered a novel therapeutic strategy to generate patient-specific stem cell lines. Here we have investigated whether iPS cells are able to differentiate into SMCs in vitro. Mouse iPS cell (O9 and TT025) monolayers were treated with 10(-5) mol/L all-trans retinoid acid (RA). After 8 days of RA treatment, we found that >40% of the O9 iPS cells expressed the SMC-markers including SMalpha-actin and SM myosin heavy chain. Also, we documented that iPS-derived SMCs acquired SMC functional characteristics including contraction and calcium influx in response to stimuli. Moreover, our results indicated that there were differences in SMC-specific gene expression patterns between SMCs derived from O9 and TT025 iPS as well as normal embryonic stem cells. These differences might be due to disparity in the current iPS technology. Taken together, our data have established a simple iPS-SMC system to generate SMCs in vitro, which has tremendous potential to generate individualized SMCs for vascular tissue engineering and personalized drug screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18795840      PMCID: PMC2914231          DOI: 10.1089/scd.2008.0179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  24 in total

1.  Flk1-positive cells derived from embryonic stem cells serve as vascular progenitors.

Authors:  J Yamashita; H Itoh; M Hirashima; M Ogawa; S Nishikawa; T Yurugi; M Naito; K Nakao; S Nishikawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Mouse ES cells: experimental exploitation of pluripotent differentiation potential.

Authors:  J Rathjen; P D Rathjen
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 3.  Embryonic stem cells as a model to study cardiac, skeletal muscle, and vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation.

Authors:  A M Wobus; K Guan; H T Yang; K R Boheler
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2002

4.  Embryonic stem cells express neuronal properties in vitro.

Authors:  G Bain; D Kitchens; M Yao; J E Huettner; D I Gottlieb
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Recruitment of serum response factor and hyperacetylation of histones at smooth muscle-specific regulatory regions during differentiation of a novel P19-derived in vitro smooth muscle differentiation system.

Authors:  I Manabe; G K Owens
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2001-06-08       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  From totipotent embryonic stem cells to spontaneously contracting smooth muscle cells: a retinoic acid and db-cAMP in vitro differentiation model.

Authors:  M Drab; H Haller; R Bychkov; B Erdmann; C Lindschau; H Haase; I Morano; F C Luft; A M Wobus
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Reprogrammed mouse fibroblasts differentiate into cells of the cardiovascular and hematopoietic lineages.

Authors:  Katja Schenke-Layland; Katrin E Rhodes; Ekaterini Angelis; Yekaterina Butylkova; Sepideh Heydarkhan-Hagvall; Christos Gekas; Rui Zhang; Joshua I Goldhaber; Hanna K Mikkola; Kathrin Plath; W Robb MacLellan
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 8.  Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease.

Authors:  Gary K Owens; Meena S Kumar; Brian R Wamhoff
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  Atorvastatin treatment prevents alterations in coronary smooth muscle nuclear Ca2+ signaling in diabetic dyslipidemia.

Authors:  B R Wamhoff; J L Dixon; M Sturek
Journal:  J Vasc Res       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.934

10.  Embryonic stem cells differentiated in vitro as a novel source of cells for transplantation.

Authors:  J Dinsmore; J Ratliff; T Deacon; P Pakzaban; D Jacoby; W Galpern; O Isacson
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.139

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Smooth muscle and other cell sources for human blood vessel engineering.

Authors:  Sumati Sundaram; Laura E Niklason
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.481

Review 2.  Molecular regulation of contractile smooth muscle cell phenotype: implications for vascular tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Beamish; Ping He; Kandice Kottke-Marchant; Roger E Marchant
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  miR-10a contributes to retinoid acid-induced smooth muscle cell differentiation.

Authors:  Huarong Huang; Changqing Xie; Xuan Sun; Raquel P Ritchie; Jifeng Zhang; Y Eugene Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Human amniotic fluid stem cell differentiation along smooth muscle lineage.

Authors:  Marco Ghionzoli; Andrea Repele; Laura Sartiani; Giulia Costanzi; Astrid Parenti; Valentina Spinelli; Anna L David; Massimo Garriboli; Giorgia Totonelli; Jun Tian; Stelios T Andreadis; Elisabetta Cerbai; Alessandro Mugelli; Antonio Messineo; Agostino Pierro; Simon Eaton; Paolo De Coppi
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Stem cell sources for vascular tissue engineering and regeneration.

Authors:  Vivek K Bajpai; Stelios T Andreadis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 6.  Stem Cell Sources and Graft Material for Vascular Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Dorothee Hielscher; Constanze Kaebisch; Benedikt Julius Valentin Braun; Kevin Gray; Edda Tobiasch
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 7.  Stem cell therapy for vascular regeneration: adult, embryonic, and induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Nicholas J Leeper; Arwen L Hunter; John P Cooke
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Career moves: induced pluripotent cells from human aortic smooth muscle cells can efficiently redifferentiate into parental phenotype.

Authors:  Raj Kishore; Prasanna Krishnamurthy; Douglas W Losordo
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Global transcriptional profiles of beating clusters derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are highly similar.

Authors:  Manoj K Gupta; Damir J Illich; Andrea Gaarz; Matthias Matzkies; Filomain Nguemo; Kurt Pfannkuche; Huamin Liang; Sabine Classen; Michael Reppel; Joachim L Schultze; Jürgen Hescheler; Tomo Sarić
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 10.  Induced pluripotent stem cells: how they will change the practice of cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  Wing Tak Wong; Nazish Sayed; John P Cooke
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.