| Literature DB >> 18794790 |
Luiz Cláudio Almeida Barbosa1, Ulisses Alves Pereira, Ana Paula Martinazzo, Célia Regina Alvares Maltha, Róbson Ricardo Teixeira, Evandro de Castro Melo.
Abstract
The concentration and the chemical composition of the essential oils obtained from different samples of Cymbopogon citratus were evaluated. Among the 12 samples investigated (11 dried leaf samples and fresh plant leaves), seven presented essential oil concentrations within the threshold established by the Brazilian legislation. The moisture content was also determined and the majority of the samples presented humidity contents near 12%. The GC and GC/MS analyses of the essential oils led to identification of 22 compounds, with neral and geranial as the two major components. The total percentage of these two compounds varied within the investigated sample oils from 40.7% to 75.4%. In addition, a considerable variation in the chemical composition of the analyzed samples was observed. The process of grinding the leaves significantly decreased (by up to 68%) the essential oil content, as well as the percentage of myrcene in the oils.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18794790 PMCID: PMC6244952 DOI: 10.3390/molecules13081864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Average values of essential oil content in dried leaf products and fresh plant leaves of Cymbopogon citratus, commercialized in Brazil.
| Sample | Sample origin | Moisture content (%)* | Oil Content (%, dried matter)* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viçosa, MG | 78.37±0.60 | 0.76±0.10c | |
| Tea bag, Viçosa, MG | 11.11±0.10 | 0.23±0.02 e | |
| Tea bag, Juiz de Fora, MG | 10.52±0.67 | 0.20±0.03 e | |
| Central Market, Belo Horizonte, MG | 11.05±0.20 | 1.20±0.08 a | |
| Central Market, Belo Horizonte, MG | 10.35±0.07 | 0.70±0.01 c | |
| Central Market, Belo Horizonte, MG | 11.94±0.20 | 0.89±0.05 b | |
| Central Market, Belo Horizonte, MG | 11.41±0.03 | 0.98±0.09 b | |
| Central Market, Belo Horizonte, MG | 12,39±0.19 | 0.45±0.04 d | |
| Tea bag, Cascavel, PR | 9.61±0.04 | 0.25±0.04 e | |
| Tea bag, Cascavel, PR | 9.76±0.21 | 0.22±0.04 e | |
| Tea bag, Viçosa, MG | 11.35±0.24 | 0.22±0.02 e | |
| Central Market, Belo Horizonte, MG | 12.40±0.26 | 1.00±0.04 b | |
| Central Market, Belo Horizonte, MG | 11.74±0.13 | 0.60±0.03 c | |
| Central Market, Belo Horizonte, MG | 18.43±0.97 | 1.33±0.14 a | |
| Central Market, Belo Horizonte, MG | 14.24±0.29 | 0.43±0.10 d |
* Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Averages followed by the same letter do not differ among themselves, by Scott-Knott test, at 5% probability; FP= Fresh Plant; g = ground commercial samples.
Chemical composition of volatile oils obtained from Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf samples.
| Peak No. | Component | RI | Relative peak area (%)* | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6g | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 10g | 11 | 11g | |||
| 1 | 6-methylhept-5-en-2-one | 993 | 0.45 | 1.56 | 0.97 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.52 | 1.09 | 0.83 | 0.46 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.49 |
| 2 | Myrcene | 996 | 1.59 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 7.29 | 4.48 | 5.79 | 7.04 | 0.24 | 1.81 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 4.71 | 0.44 | 6.33 | 0.33 |
| 3 | ( | 1039 | - | - | - | 0.19 | 0.14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.13 | - |
| 4 | 1081 | - | 0.04 | - | - | 0.18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.08 | |
| 5 | 1090 | - | 1.32 | 1.57 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 1.44 | - | - | 1.77 | - | 0.51 | - | 0.90 | 0.81 | 1.13 | |
| 6 | Linalool | 1091 | 0.81 | - | 0.12 | - | - | - | 0.66 | 0.15 | - | 1.64 | - | - | 0.06 | - | - |
| 7 | Citronellol | 1219 | - | - | 0.93 | - | - | - | - | - | 1.04 | 0.99 | - | - | 0.27 | 0.31 | 0.84 |
| 8 | Neral | 1235 | 31.53 | 18.02 | 15.94 | 22.76 | 23.72 | 21.48 | 15.38 | 18.11 | 21.61 | 19.73 | 11.44 | 17.49 | 16.41 | 18.67 | 21.45 |
| 9 | Geraniol | 1249 | 1.40 | 11.87 | 7.00 | 1.76 | 1.13 | 4.01 | 0.40 | 2.39 | 7.10 | 6.09 | 8.07 | 1.29 | 1.26 | 1.09 | 3.07 |
| 10 | Geranial | 1267 | 50.18 | 33.26 | 32.46 | 49.63 | 51.69 | 43.62 | 47.73 | 44.17 | 38.84 | 38.57 | 29.21 | 46.20 | 47.21 | 46.25 | 44.86 |
| 11 | ( | 1278 | - | - | 1.48 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | Undecan-2-one | 1287 | 0.66 | 0.31 | 0.47 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.36 | 0.54 | 0.86 | 0.38 | - | 0.25 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.89 |
| 13 | Geranyl acetate | 1380 | - | 0.49 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.20 | 0.20 | - | - | 0.35 | 0.35 | - | - | - | - | - |
| 14 | ( | 1417 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.06 | 0.67 |
| 15 | 1435 | - | 0.16 | 0.22 | - | - | - | - | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.17 | - | 0.07 | - | - | |
| 16 | ( | 1484 | - | 0.24 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.14 |
| 17 | Cuparene | 1503 | - | - | 0.33 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.50 | - | - | - | - |
| 18 | γ-Cadinene | 1514 | - | - | 0.60 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.66 | 0.34 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.22 |
| 19 | δ-Cadinene | 1522 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.16 | - | - | 0.69 | 0.10 | 0.13 | - | - |
| 20 | Caryophyllene oxide | 1582 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.27 | - | - | - | - | 0.31 | 0.06 | 0.05 | - | - |
| 21 | Torreyol | 1643 | - | - | 0.72 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.77 | - | - | - | - |
| 22 | Juniper camphor | 1695 | - | - | 0.21 | - | - | - | - | 0.19 | - | - | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.35 |
| Total identified: | 86.62 | 68.02 | 65.14 | 83.21 | 83.01 | 77.47 | 71.84 | 66.91 | 74.14 | 68.77 | 53.75 | 71.09 | 68.24 | 74.88 | 74.52 | ||
* Average of three repetitions. The variation coefficient was less than 10%.
RI = Retention Index.
g = ground commercial samples
FP = Fresh Plant
Figure 1Citral content (%) in essential oil of dried leaf samples and fresh plant leaves of Cymbopogon citratus.
Figure 2C. citratus markers.
Figure 3Variation in the myrcene and geraniol contents (%) in essential oil of dried leaf samples and fresh plant leaves of Cymbopogon citratus.