Literature DB >> 18794686

Assessment of closing pressure in silicone Ahmed FP7 glaucoma valves.

Edward B Moss1, Graham E Trope.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure closing pressure in a series of new Model FP7 silicone Ahmed Glaucoma Valves (AGVs), using an in vitro gravity-driven system, in which closing pressure was measured directly from a dual manometer/pressure reservoir.
METHOD: A straight length of tubing served as an open manometer, which connected via a 3-way stopcock to the inlet of the AGV submerged under 1.5 cm of balanced saline solution (BSS). Six AGV were assessed in 5 sequential trials and the mean inlet pressure at 90 minutes was recorded as the closing pressure. After testing, a single valve was primed a second time using greater force and retested. Control trials were performed with a submerged 26-G cannula opening directly into the BSS bath.
RESULTS: At 90 minutes, the 6 valves equilibrated at a mean inlet pressure of 7.1 mm Hg, with a range from 1.4 to 13.5 mm Hg. Closing pressures at or less than 5 mm Hg were measured in half (3/6) of the valves tested. The average flow of BSS across the valves in the final 30 minutes was less than 1.5x10(-2) microL/min. In the single valve reperfused under greater pressure, the closing pressure increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Model FP7 AGVs, in vitro, exhibit significant variability in closing pressure, with half closing at intraocular pressures considered potentially problematic in clinical situations. The results of the high-pressure perfusion experiment suggest that more research into the priming process is required so a precise description can be developed for surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18794686     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181622532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  7 in total

1.  Intraoperative testing of opening and closing pressure predicts risk of low intraocular pressure after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation.

Authors:  F Bochmann; A Kipfer; J Tarantino; C Kaufmann; L Bachmann; M Thiel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Assessing risk factors for postoperative hypotony in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation surgery.

Authors:  Ahmet Kaderli; Gülizar Demirok; Güner Üney; Mehmet Yakın; Berku Günal; Ümit Ekşioğlu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Is Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Consistent in Performance?

Authors:  Nikhil S Choudhari; Swathi Vallabh Badakere; Ashutosh Richhariya; Sai Naga Sri Harsha Chittajallu; Sirisha Senthil; Chandra Sekhar Garudadri
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Evaluation of the Ultrastructural and In Vitro Flow Properties of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt.

Authors:  Marta Ibarz Barberá; Jose Luis Hernández-Verdejo; Jean Bragard; Javier Burguete; Laura Morales Fernández; Pedro Tañá Rivero; Rosario Gómez de Liaño; Miguel A Teus
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Posterior segment complications of Ahmed valve implantation.

Authors:  Yuli Park; Kyong Jin Cho
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 6.  Preimplantation Flow Testing of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve and the Early Postoperative Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Emma Jones; Pouya Alaghband; Jason Cheng; Laura Beltran-Agullo; Kin Sheng Lim
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2013-01-15

Review 7.  Conventional glaucoma implants and the new MIGS devices: a comprehensive review of current options and future directions.

Authors:  Inês C F Pereira; Rosanne van de Wijdeven; Hans M Wyss; Henny J M Beckers; Jaap M J den Toonder
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.775

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.