Literature DB >> 18794591

Comparison of support provided by ankle taping and semirigid orthosis.

M T Gross, M K Bradshaw, L C Ventry, K H Weller.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ankle taping and a semirigid orthosis in providing ankle support before and after exercise. Twenty-two ankles were treated with ankle taping (treatment I) and a semirigid orthoses (treatment 11). Passive ankle inversion-eversion was measured on a Cybex IP prior to application of the treatment, following application of the treatment, and following a brief period of exercise. A two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey analyses indicated that post-application and post-exercise ankle motion was significantly less than preapplication motion for both treatment groups. However, inversion motion postexercise was significantly greater than pre-exercise motion for the taping condition, and the semirigid orthosis limited ankle motion significantly more than the taping treatment following exercise. The results suggest that a semirigid orthosis similar to the one tested in this study may be more effective in preventing ankle sprain njuries than athletic tape J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1987;9(1):33-39.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 18794591     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1987.9.1.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  11 in total

Review 1.  The effect of ankle bracing on athletic performance.

Authors:  S D Bot; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Collegiate Football Players' Ankle Range of Motion and Dynamic Balance in Braced and Self-Adherent-Taped Conditions.

Authors:  Kristin Willeford; Justin M Stanek; Todd A McLoda
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Factors associated with ankle injuries. Preventive measures.

Authors:  S Robbins; E Waked
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Stabilizing effects of ankle bracing under a combination of inversion and axial compression loading.

Authors:  Harukazu Tohyama; Kazunori Yasuda; Bruce D Beynnon; Per A Renstrom
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  The effect of tape, braces and shoes on ankle range of motion.

Authors:  E A Verhagen; A J van der Beek; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.

Authors:  P A Hume; D F Gerrard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  The influence of orthoses on the proprioception of the ankle joint.

Authors:  J Jerosch; I Hoffstetter; H Bork; M Bischof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  The 2BFit study: is an unsupervised proprioceptive balance board training programme, given in addition to usual care, effective in preventing ankle sprain recurrences? Design of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maarten D W Hupperets; Evert A L M Verhagen; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.