PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib as a single agent and in combination with temozolomide in children with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Erlotinib was administered orally once daily to cohorts of three to six children for a single 28-day course. Patients then received the combination of daily erlotinib and temozolomide daily for 5 days for all subsequent 28-day courses. An oral erlotinib solution was administered during the dose-finding phase and a tablet formulation was subsequently studied at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetic studies and ERBB-receptor expression and signaling studies were performed. RESULTS: Forty-six patients, median age 11.5 years, received erlotinib at doses of 35, 50, 65, 85, or 110 mg/m(2)/d. At 110 mg/m(2)/d, two of four patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisting of rash and hyperbilirubinemia, whereas one of six patients developed dose-limiting rash at 85 mg/m(2)/d. The most frequent non-DLTs included diarrhea, rash, and hyperbilirubinemia. The combination of erlotinib and temozolomide was well tolerated. The median apparent erlotinib clearance was 3.1 L/h/m(2) and the median terminal half-life was 8.7 hours. One patient with a neurocytoma had stable disease for 19 months, two patients with neuroblastoma remained on study for 23 and 24 months, and one patient with myoepithelioma had a mixed response. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II dose of erlotinib in recurrent pediatric solid tumors is 85 mg/m(2)/d, either alone or in combination with temozolomide.
PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib as a single agent and in combination with temozolomide in children with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Erlotinib was administered orally once daily to cohorts of three to six children for a single 28-day course. Patients then received the combination of daily erlotinib and temozolomide daily for 5 days for all subsequent 28-day courses. An oral erlotinib solution was administered during the dose-finding phase and a tablet formulation was subsequently studied at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetic studies and ERBB-receptor expression and signaling studies were performed. RESULTS: Forty-six patients, median age 11.5 years, received erlotinib at doses of 35, 50, 65, 85, or 110 mg/m(2)/d. At 110 mg/m(2)/d, two of four patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisting of rash and hyperbilirubinemia, whereas one of six patients developed dose-limiting rash at 85 mg/m(2)/d. The most frequent non-DLTs included diarrhea, rash, and hyperbilirubinemia. The combination of erlotinib and temozolomide was well tolerated. The median apparent erlotinib clearance was 3.1 L/h/m(2) and the median terminal half-life was 8.7 hours. One patient with a neurocytoma had stable disease for 19 months, two patients with neuroblastoma remained on study for 23 and 24 months, and one patient with myoepithelioma had a mixed response. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II dose of erlotinib in recurrent pediatric solid tumors is 85 mg/m(2)/d, either alone or in combination with temozolomide.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: M Hidalgo; L L Siu; J Nemunaitis; J Rizzo; L A Hammond; C Takimoto; S G Eckhardt; A Tolcher; C D Britten; L Denis; K Ferrante; D D Von Hoff; S Silberman; E K Rowinsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F Ciardiello; R Caputo; R Bianco; V Damiano; G Pomatico; S De Placido; A R Bianco; G Tortora Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J D Moyer; E G Barbacci; K K Iwata; L Arnold; B Boman; A Cunningham; C DiOrio; J Doty; M J Morin; M P Moyer; M Neveu; V A Pollack; L R Pustilnik; M M Reynolds; D Sloan; A Theleman; P Miller Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1997-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: C De Giovanni; L Landuzzi; F Frabetti; G Nicoletti; C Griffoni; I Rossi; M Mazzotti; L Scotto; P Nanni; P L Lollini Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1996-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: H Stacy Nicholson; Cynthia S Kretschmar; Mark Krailo; Mark Bernstein; Richard Kadota; Daniel Fort; Henry Friedman; Michael B Harris; Nicole Tedeschi-Blok; Claire Mazewski; Judith Sato; Gregory H Reaman Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: H S Friedman; M E Dolan; A E Pegg; S Marcelli; S Keir; J J Catino; D D Bigner; S C Schold Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1995-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Brian Higgins; Kenneth Kolinsky; Melissa Smith; Gordon Beck; Mohammad Rashed; Violeta Adames; Michael Linn; Eric Wheeldon; Laurent Gand; Herbert Birnboeck; Gerhard Hoffmann Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: Srilatha Nalluri; Susan K Peirce; Rachel Tanos; Haneen A Abdella; Dipan Karmali; Michael D Hogarty; Kelly C Goldsmith Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.742