Literature DB >> 18794050

Improving quality of patient care in an emergency department: a laboratory perspective.

Chelsea Sheppard1, Nicole Franks, Frederick Nolte, Corinne Fantz.   

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to improve the quality of care in an emergency department (ED) as measured by length of stay (LOS), total turnaround time (TAT) for laboratory result reporting, and the blood culture contamination rate. Data were included for patients who had at least 1 of 5 laboratory tests performed as part of their care. The study was conducted in 2 phases. First, phlebotomy was performed by a dedicated phlebotomist or nonlaboratory personnel. The second phase added a dedicated laboratory technologist. There was a significant reduction in total TAT for all tests (at least 46 and 75 minutes in the respective interventions), and blood culture contamination rates dropped from 5.0% to 1.1%, although the overall LOS did not change. Estimated cost avoidance is more than $400,000 annually. Quality of care in an ED is improved when samples are collected by a dedicated phlebotomist, but overall LOS does not change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18794050     DOI: 10.1309/DGXYTH0VNTTQRQHD

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  6 in total

1.  No preanalytical errors in laboratory testing: a beneficial aspect for patients.

Authors:  Satyavati V Rana
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-10

2.  Cost analysis of strategies to reduce blood culture contamination in the emergency department: sterile collection kits and phlebotomy teams.

Authors:  Wesley H Self; Thomas R Talbot; Barbara R Paul; Sean P Collins; Michael J Ward
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 3.  Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood culture contamination: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan R Snyder; Alessandra M Favoretto; Rich Ann Baetz; James H Derzon; Bereneice M Madison; Diana Mass; Colleen S Shaw; Christopher D Layfield; Robert H Christenson; Edward B Liebow
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 3.281

Review 4.  Mapping turnaround times (TAT) to a generic timeline: a systematic review of TAT definitions in clinical domains.

Authors:  Bernhard Breil; Fleur Fritz; Volker Thiemann; Martin Dugas
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Does Elimination of a Laboratory Sample Clotting Stage Requirement Reduce Overall Turnaround Times for Emergency Department Stat Biochemical Testing?

Authors:  Sarah Compeau; Michael Howlett; Stephanie Matchett; Jennifer Shea; Jacqueline Fraser; Rose McCloskey; Paul Atkinson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-10-06

6.  Specimen rejection in laboratory medicine: Necessary for patient safety?

Authors:  Zeliha Gunnur Dikmen; Asli Pinar; Filiz Akbiyik
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.