PURPOSE: To introduce a version of the Lyman normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) model adapted to incorporate censored time-to-toxicity data and clinical risk factors and to apply the generalized model to analysis of radiation pneumonitis (RP) risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Medical records and radiation treatment plans were reviewed retrospectively for 576 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy. The time to severe (Grade >/=3) RP was computed, with event times censored at last follow-up for patients not experiencing this endpoint. The censored time-to-toxicity data were analyzed using the standard and generalized Lyman models with patient smoking status taken into account. RESULTS: The generalized Lyman model with patient smoking status taken into account produced NTCP estimates up to 27 percentage points different from the model based on dose-volume factors alone. The generalized model also predicted that 8% of the expected cases of severe RP were unobserved because of censoring. The estimated volume parameter for lung was not significantly different from n = 1, corresponding to mean lung dose. CONCLUSIONS: NTCP models historically have been based solely on dose-volume effects and binary (yes/no) toxicity data. Our results demonstrate that inclusion of nondosimetric risk factors and censored time-to-event data can markedly affect outcome predictions made using NTCP models.
PURPOSE: To introduce a version of the Lyman normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) model adapted to incorporate censored time-to-toxicity data and clinical risk factors and to apply the generalized model to analysis of radiationpneumonitis (RP) risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Medical records and radiation treatment plans were reviewed retrospectively for 576 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy. The time to severe (Grade >/=3) RP was computed, with event times censored at last follow-up for patients not experiencing this endpoint. The censored time-to-toxicity data were analyzed using the standard and generalized Lyman models with patient smoking status taken into account. RESULTS: The generalized Lyman model with patient smoking status taken into account produced NTCP estimates up to 27 percentage points different from the model based on dose-volume factors alone. The generalized model also predicted that 8% of the expected cases of severe RP were unobserved because of censoring. The estimated volume parameter for lung was not significantly different from n = 1, corresponding to mean lung dose. CONCLUSIONS:NTCP models historically have been based solely on dose-volume effects and binary (yes/no) toxicity data. Our results demonstrate that inclusion of nondosimetric risk factors and censored time-to-event data can markedly affect outcome predictions made using NTCP models.
Authors: M L Hernando; L B Marks; G C Bentel; S M Zhou; D Hollis; S K Das; M Fan; M T Munley; T D Shafman; M S Anscher; P A Lind Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Ellen D Yorke; Andrew Jackson; Kenneth E Rosenzweig; Scott A Merrick; Dorota Gabrys; Ennapadam S Venkatraman; Chandra M Burman; Steven A Leibel; C Clifton Ling Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Feng-Ming Kong; James A Hayman; Kent A Griffith; Gregory P Kalemkerian; Douglas Arenberg; Susan Lyons; Andrew Turrisi; Allen Lichter; Benedick Fraass; Avraham Eisbruch; Theodore S Lawrence; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-05-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Yvette Seppenwoolde; Joos V Lebesque; Katrien de Jaeger; José S A Belderbos; Liesbeth J Boersma; Cees Schilstra; George T Henning; James A Hayman; Mary K Martel; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Yvette Seppenwoolde; Katrien De Jaeger; Liesbeth J Boersma; José S A Belderbos; Joos V Lebesque Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Andy Trotti; A Dimitrios Colevas; Ann Setser; Valerie Rusch; David Jaques; Volker Budach; Corey Langer; Barbara Murphy; Richard Cumberlin; C Norman Coleman; Philip Rubin Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: David L Schwartz; Katherine Hutcheson; Denise Barringer; Susan L Tucker; Merrill Kies; F Christopher Holsinger; K Kian Ang; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; Adam S Garden; Lei Dong; Jan S Lewin Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Andrew Jackson; Lawrence B Marks; Søren M Bentzen; Avraham Eisbruch; Ellen D Yorke; Randal K Ten Haken; Louis S Constine; Joseph O Deasy Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Susan L Tucker; Lei Dong; Walter R Bosch; Jeff Michalski; Kathryn Winter; Radhe Mohan; James A Purdy; Deborah Kuban; Andrew K Lee; M Rex Cheung; Howard D Thames; James D Cox Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-07-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Susan L Tucker; Howard D Thames; Jeff M Michalski; Walter R Bosch; Radhe Mohan; Kathryn Winter; James D Cox; James A Purdy; Lei Dong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: K Eom; E K Chie; K Kim; J J Jang; S W Kim; D Y Oh; S A Im; T Y Kim; Y J Bang; S W Ha Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-08-03 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Timothy Ritter; Douglas J Quint; Suresh Senan; Laurie E Gaspar; Ritsuko U Komaki; Coen W Hurkmans; Robert Timmerman; Andrea Bezjak; Jeffrey D Bradley; Benjamin Movsas; Lon Marsh; Paul Okunieff; Hak Choy; Walter J Curran Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy; Chad G Rusthoven; Leah Schubert; Bernard Jones; Austin Faught; Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Laurie E Gaspar; Jennifer Kwak; Timothy Waxweiler; Michele Dougherty; Dexiang Gao; Craig Stevens; Moyed Miften; Brian Kavanagh; Thomas Guerrero; Inga Grills Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 7.038