Literature DB >> 18793543

Serum cystatin C-based equation compared to serum creatinine-based equations for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic kidney disease.

R Hojs1, S Bevc, R Ekart, M Gorenjak, L Puklavec.   

Abstract

Estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for the evaluation of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) and modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formulas are serum creatinine-based equations, and the most widely used tests for renal function. Recently, serum cystatin C-based equations were proposed as markers for estimation of GFR. The present study compares our serum cystatin C-based equation (cystatin C formula) and serum creatinine-based equations for a large group of patients with CKD. In this study, 592 adult patients with CKD were enrolled. In each patient, serum creatinine was determined and creatinine clearance was calculated using the CG and MDRD formulas. The serum cystatin C was determined by an immunonephelometric method and our own cystatin C formula (GFR = 90.63 x cystatin C-1.192) for estimation of GFR was developed. GFR was measured using 51CrEDTA clearance, and the correlation, accuracy, bias and precision were determined. Ability to correctly estimate the patient's GFR with different equations compared to gold standard below and above 60 ml/min/1.73 m2; was analyzed. The mean 51CrEDTA clearance was 47 ml/min/1.73 m2, the mean serum creatinine was 269 micromol/l and the mean serum cystatin C was 2.68 mg/l. Statistically significant correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance with the CG (r = 0.861) and MDRD (r = 0.909) formulas and the cystatin C formula (r = 0.899) was found. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (cut-off for GFR 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) showed that the cystatin C formula had a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than the CG formula (p < 0.003). All equations underestimated the measured GFR and lacked precision. Analysis of ability to correctly predict the patient's GFR below or above 60/ml/min/1.73 m2 showed a higher prediction for the cystatin C formula than the MDRD formula (91.6 versus 84.1%, p < 0.0005) and a higher prediction trend than the CG formula (91.6 versus 88.3%, p = 0.078). Our results indicate that serum cystatin C-based equation is a reliable marker of GFR with a very high diagnostic accuracy and ability to predict patients with CKD and GFR under 60/ml/min/1.73 m2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18793543     DOI: 10.5414/cnp70010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-0430            Impact factor:   0.975


  16 in total

1.  Reference values for serum creatinine in children younger than 1 year of age.

Authors:  Dirk P Boer; Yolanda B de Rijke; Wim C Hop; Karlien Cransberg; Eiske M Dorresteijn
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 2.  Established and emerging markers of kidney function.

Authors:  Michael A Ferguson; Sushrut S Waikar
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 3.  Ageing and the glomerular filtration rate: truths and consequences.

Authors:  Richard J Glassock; Christopher Winearls
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2009

Review 4.  Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: Still searching for the best marker.

Authors:  Josefina Santos; La Salete Martins
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-06

5.  Vitamin D Supplementation for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Trials Investigating the Response to Supplementation and an Overview of Guidelines.

Authors:  Marilena Christodoulou; Terence J Aspray; Inez Schoenmakers
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Evaluation of methods based on creatinine and cystatin C to estimate glomerular filtration rate in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Almudena Vega; Soledad García de Vinuesa; Marian Goicoechea; Ursula Verdalles; María Luz Martínez-Pueyo; Ana Chacón; Borja Quiroga; José Luño
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Role of cystatin C and renal resistive index in assessment of renal function in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Dorđe Ćulafić; Miloš Štulić; Radmila Obrenović; Danijela Miletić; Dragana Mijač; Milica Stojković; Marija Jovanović; Milica Ćulafić
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Determination of effective half-life of 131I in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: comparison of cystatin C and creatinine-based estimation of renal function.

Authors:  Martin Freesmeyer; Falk Gühne; Christian Kühnel; Thomas Opfermann; Thomas Winkens; Anke Werner
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Simple cystatin C formula for estimation of glomerular filtration rate in overweight patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Sebastjan Bevc; Radovan Hojs; Robert Ekart; Matej Završnik; Maksimiljan Gorenjak; Ludvik Puklavec
Journal:  Exp Diabetes Res       Date:  2012-09-12

10.  Clinical Assessment of Follow-Up Cystatin C-Based eGFR in Live Kidney Donors.

Authors:  Hyun Ho Han; Kyung Hwa Choi; Seung Choul Yang; Woong Kyu Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.