Literature DB >> 18792939

Selecting the right protein-scoring matrix.

David Wheeler1.   

Abstract

Every program for searching protein sequences against a database includes a choice of a protein weight matrix, also called a scoring matrix. Weight matrices add sensitivity to the search, while statistical significance adds selectivity. Virtually every user chooses the default, typically PAM 250 or BLOSUM62. Despite the fact that the choice of matrix can strongly influence the outcome of the analysis, most users do not know why a particular matrix should be used. In general, scoring matrices implicitly represent a particular theory of protein sequence evolution. Understanding the assumptions underlying the PAM and BLOSUM scoring matrices can aid in making the proper choice. The purpose of this unit is to guide the choice of a scoring matrix. It covers the selection of PAM matrices, BLOSUM matrices and provides a brief overview of the wide variety of specialized scoring matrices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 18792939     DOI: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0305s00

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1934-3396


  3 in total

1.  Graph pyramids for protein function prediction.

Authors:  Tushar Sandhan; Youngjun Yoo; Jin Choi; Sun Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.063

2.  Design of a Multi-epitope Vaccine Against Acinetobacter baumannii Using Immunoinformatics Approach.

Authors:  Maryam Touhidinia; Fatemeh Sefid; Mozhgan Bidakhavidi
Journal:  Int J Pept Res Ther       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 1.931

3.  A graph-based clustering method applied to protein sequences.

Authors:  Pooja Mishra; Paras Nath Pandey
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2011-08-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.