Literature DB >> 18792118

Parameter selection and programming recommendations for the ACE and CIS speech-processing strategies in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Kerrie L Plant1, Lesley A Whitford, Colleen E Psarros, Andrew E Vandali.   

Abstract

This study evaluated a range of programming parameters available for the ACE and CIS speech-processing strategies in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Specifically, the effect on speech perception of adjustments to the number of channels and the stimulation rate in the CIS strategy, and the effect of adjustments to the number of maxima in the ACE strategy were investigated in a group of adult subjects. Based on these findings, and the results of a previous study (Vandali et al., 2000), a number of recommendations for programming were identified that could improve efficiency in the clinical setting where time may be limited. The results suggest that speech perception benefits may be maximized for an individual cochlear implant recipient through concentration on selection of the appropriate stimulation rate. When using the CIS strategy, the number of channels should also be optimized. Adjustment to the number of maxima in the ACE strategy was found to be less likely to provide improvements in speech recognition for a given individual when the number of maxima parameter is set to eight or 12.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 18792118     DOI: 10.1179/cim.2002.3.2.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  5 in total

1.  Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant users' phoneme, word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; Rachel J Cruz; John J Galvin
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 2.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

3.  The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Wiebke Lamping; Tobias Goehring; Jeremy Marozeau; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Clinical evaluation of cochlear implant sound coding taking into account conjectural masking functions, MP3000™.

Authors:  Andreas Buechner; Andy Beynon; Witold Szyfter; Kazimierz Niemczyk; Ulrich Hoppe; Matthias Hey; Jan Brokx; Julie Eyles; Paul Van de Heyning; Gaetano Paludetti; Andrzej Zarowski; Nicola Quaranta; Thomas Wesarg; Joost Festen; Heidi Olze; Ingeborg Dhooge; Joachim Müller-Deile; Angel Ramos; Stephane Roman; Jean-Pierre Piron; Domenico Cuda; Sandro Burdo; Wilko Grolman; Samantha Roux Vaillard; Alicia Huarte; Bruno Frachet; Constantine Morera; Luis Garcia-Ibáñez; Daniel Abels; Martin Walger; Jochen Müller-Mazotta; Carlo Antonio Leone; Bernard Meyer; Norbert Dillier; Thomas Steffens; André Gentine; Manuela Mazzoli; Gerben Rypkema; Matthijs Killian; Guido Smoorenburg
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-11

5.  Effects of electrical stimulation rate on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Sung Hye Park; Eunoak Kim; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Hyung-Jong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Audiol       Date:  2012-04-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.