Literature DB >> 18791718

Mechanistic population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound paclitaxel for a new nanodroplet formulation versus Taxol in cancer patients.

Jürgen B Bulitta1, Ping Zhao, Robert D Arnold, Dean R Kessler, Richard Daifuku, James Pratt, Gabriel Luciano, Axel-R Hanauske, Hans Gelderblom, Ahmad Awada, William J Jusko.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our objectives were (1) to compare the disposition and in vivo release of paclitaxel between a tocopherol-based Cremophor-free formulation (Tocosol Paclitaxel) and Cremophor EL-formulated paclitaxel (Taxol) in human subjects, and (2) to develop a mechanistic model for unbound and total paclitaxel pharmacokinetics.
METHODS: A total of 35 patients (average +/- SD age: 59 +/-13 years) with advanced non-hematological malignancies were studied in a randomized two-way crossover trial. Patients received 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel as 15 min (Tocosol Paclitaxel) or 3 h (Taxol) intravenous infusion in each study period. Paclitaxel concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS in plasma ultrafiltrate and whole blood. NONMEM VI was used for population pharmacokinetics.
RESULTS: A linear disposition model with three compartments for unbound paclitaxel and a one-compartment model for Cremophor were applied. Total clearance of unbound paclitaxel was 845 L/h (variability: 25% CV). The prolonged release with Tocosol Paclitaxel was explained by the limited solubility of unbound paclitaxel of 405 ng/mL (estimated) in plasma. The 15 min Tocosol Paclitaxel infusion yielded a mean time to 90% cumulative input of 1.14 +/- 0.16 h. Tocosol Paclitaxel was estimated to release 9.8% of the dose directly into the deep peripheral compartment. The model accounted for the presence of drug-containing nanodroplets in blood.
CONCLUSIONS: Population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated linear disposition and a potentially higher bioavailability of unbound paclitaxel following Tocosol Paclitaxel administration due to direct release at the target site. The prolonged release of Tocosol Paclitaxel supports 15 min paclitaxel infusions. This mechanistic model may be important for development of prolonged release formulations that distribute in and from the systemic circulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18791718     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-008-0827-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  26 in total

1.  Nanoparticulate paclitaxel demonstrates antitumor activity in PC3 and Ace-1 aggressive prostate cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Sandra M Axiak-Bechtel; Senthil R Kumar; Kristin K Dank; Nicole A Clarkson; Kim A Selting; Jeffrey N Bryan; Thomas J Rosol; Jahna Espinosa; Charles J Decedue
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Development of a new pre- and post-processing tool (SADAPT-TRAN) for nonlinear mixed-effects modeling in S-ADAPT.

Authors:  Jurgen Bernd Bulitta; Ayhan Bingölbali; Beom Soo Shin; Cornelia Barbara Landersdorfer
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Performance and robustness of the Monte Carlo importance sampling algorithm using parallelized S-ADAPT for basic and complex mechanistic models.

Authors:  Jurgen B Bulitta; Cornelia B Landersdorfer
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of the Enterohepatic Recirculation of Fimasartan in Rats, Dogs, and Humans.

Authors:  Tae Hwan Kim; Soyoung Shin; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Yong Ha Chi; Soo Heui Paik; Jayhyuk Myung; Rajbharan Yadav; Stefan Horkovics-Kovats; Jürgen B Bulitta; Beom Soo Shin
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Pulmonary Pharmacokinetics of Colistin following Administration of Dry Powder Aerosols in Rats.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Lin; Qi Tony Zhou; Yang Hu; Nikolas J Onufrak; Siping Sun; Jiping Wang; Alan Forrest; Hak-Kim Chan; Jian Li
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Nanocarrier for poorly water-soluble anticancer drugs--barriers of translation and solutions.

Authors:  Mayuri Narvekar; Hui Yi Xue; June Young Eoh; Ho Lun Wong
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 7.  When Is It Important to Measure Unbound Drug in Evaluating Nanomedicine Pharmacokinetics?

Authors:  Stephan T Stern; Marilyn N Martinez; David M Stevens
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.922

8.  Optimization of Synergistic Combination Regimens against Carbapenem- and Aminoglycoside-Resistant Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates via Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling.

Authors:  Rajbharan Yadav; Jürgen B Bulitta; Roger L Nation; Cornelia B Landersdorfer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of Ertapenem in Plasma and Tissue Assessed via Microdialysis in Morbidly Obese Patients after Laparoscopic Visceral Surgery.

Authors:  Mathias Wittau; Stephan Paschke; Max Kurlbaum; Jan Scheele; Neang S Ly; Evelyn Hemper; Marko Kornmann; Doris Henne-Bruns; Jürgen B Bulitta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval.

Authors:  Duhyeong Hwang; Jacob D Ramsey; Alexander V Kabanov
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.