Literature DB >> 18791703

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts and double biodegradable femoral cross-pin fixation: functional, radiographic and MRI outcome after 2-year minimum follow-up.

Patrick Weninger1, Benno Zifko, Michael Liska, Ralf Spitaler, Hartmut Pelinka, Harald Hertz.   

Abstract

Double biodegradable cross-pins are increasingly used for femoral fixation in arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). There are no studies combining functional outcome analysis, radiographs and magnetic resonance images (MRI) to evaluate this technique. The authors examined 45 patients after ACL reconstruction using double biodegradable femoral cross-pin fixation and biodegradable tibial interference screw fixation with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Clinical evaluation included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and modified Lysholm score. Radiographic analysis included standard X-rays in anterior-posterior and lateral views and Telos stress device measurements. MRI was analyzed to obtain information about hardware, intra-articular graft, osseous graft-integration and cartilage. IKDC score revealed 28 (62.2%) patients with normal knee function (group A), 15 (33.3%) patients with nearly normal (group B) knee function and 2 (4.4%) patients with abnormal knee function (group C). The Lysholm score was 94.6 (+/-7.2) in the operated knee and 98.8 (+/-7.4) in the non-operated knee. Mean Telos stress device values were +4.6 (+/-2.6) in the operated and +3.9 (+/-2.4) in the non-operated knee. MRI showed an intact intra-articular graft in all but one patient. Complete femoral graft integration was seen in 88.9% and complete tibial graft integration in 86.7%. Biodegradable cross-pins were partially or fully visible in all patients. The biodegradable tibial interference screw was fully visible in 16 (35.6%) and partially visible in 20 (44.4%) patients. Thirty-one (68.9%) patients showed signs of cartilage degeneration on MRI at follow-up. The graft fixation with double biodegradable pin fixation appears to be a reliable technique for ACL reconstruction providing a stable close-to-joint graft fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18791703     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0585-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  40 in total

1.  Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation.

Authors:  C Benjamin Ma; Kimberly Francis; Jeffrey Towers; Jay Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Christopher H Harner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Bone tunnel remodeling at the site of biodegradable interference screws used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  G Lajtai; G Schmiedhuber; F Unger; G Aitzetmüller; M Klein; I Noszian; E Orthner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft with double biodegradable femoral pin fixation.

Authors:  Mahir Mahirogullari; Yucel Oguz; Huseyin Ozkan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Foreign-body reactions to fracture fixation implants of biodegradable synthetic polymers.

Authors:  O Böstman; E Hirvensalo; J Mäkinen; P Rokkanen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-07

5.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods.

Authors:  A F Anderson; R B Snyder; A B Lipscomb
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of biodegradable transfemoral fixation used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrew J Cossey; Yegappan Kalairajah; Russell Morcom; Anthony J Spriggins
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft.

Authors:  Sahnghoon Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Hyunchul Jo; Yoon Keun Park; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Braden C Fleming; Pekka Kannus; Michael Kaplan; John Samani; Per Renström
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The incidence and outcome of patella fractures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Drew A Stein; Stephen A Hunt; Jeffrey E Rosen; Orrin H Sherman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  10 in total

1.  Radiological evaluation for conflict of the femoral tunnel entrance area prior to anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery.

Authors:  Philippe M Tscholl; Roland M Biedert; Imre Gal
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Longitudinal Changes in the Total Knee Joint Moment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Correlate With Cartilage Thickness Changes.

Authors:  JenniferC Erhart-Hledik; ConstanceR Chu; JessicaL Asay; Julien Favre; ThomasP Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  The combination of radiostereometric analysis and the telos stress device results in poor precision for knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  O G Sørensen; K Larsen; B W Jakobsen; S Kold; T B Hansen; M Lind; K Søballe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Articular cartilage status 2 years after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in patients with or without concomitant meniscal surgery: evaluation with 3.0T MR imaging.

Authors:  S Michalitsis; M Hantes; P Thriskos; A Tsezou; K N Malizos; I Fezoulidis; M Vlychou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Longitudinal changes in knee gait mechanics between 2 and 8 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jennifer C Erhart-Hledik; Constance R Chu; Jessica L Asay; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  Assessment of functional performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of measurement procedures.

Authors:  Nicky Engelen-van Melick; Robert E H van Cingel; Marsha P W Tijssen; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Decreased Knee Joint Loading Associated With Early Knee Osteoarthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wellsandt; Emily S Gardinier; Kurt Manal; Michael J Axe; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Bioabsorbable interference screw versus bioabsorbable cross pins: influence of femoral graft fixation on the clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephan Frosch; Anne Rittstieg; Peter Balcarek; Tim Alexander Walde; Jan P Schüttrumpf; Martin M Wachowski; Klaus M Stürmer; Karl-Heinz Frosch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  ACL graft re-rupture after double-bundle reconstruction: factors that influence the intra-articular pattern of injury.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Eric J Kropf; James R Romanowski; Bryson P Lesniak; Michael J Tranovich; C Niek van Dijk; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  RISKS AND CONSEQUENCES OF USING THE TRANSPORTAL TECHNIQUE IN RECONSTRUCTING THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT: RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE FEMORAL TUNNEL, LATERAL SUPERIOR GENICULAR ARTERY AND LATERAL EPICONDYLE OF THE FEMORAL CONDYLE.

Authors:  Diego Costa Astur; Vinicius Aleluia; Ciro Veronese Santos; Gustavo Gonçalves Arliani; Ricardo Badra; Saulo Gomes Oliveira; Camila Cohen Kaleka; Moisés Cohen
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.