Literature DB >> 18791585

Pain perception during inferior alveolar injection administered with the Wand or conventional syringe.

C Yesilyurt1, G Bulut, T Taşdemir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared a computerised device (the Wand) with a conventional syringe in terms of the pain of needle insertion and injection during inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block injection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The subjects were 40 patients between the ages of 18 and 30 years requiring local anaesthesia for dental restoration in the mandible. Before anaesthetic administration, the patients' anxiety levels were determined. Contralateral IAN injections were administrated at two separate appointments with random use of either the Wand or a conventional syringe. Following the injection, the patients used both the pain rating score (PRS) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess the intensity of pain.
RESULTS: When pain was measured after the injection, the Wand was found to be less painful than the syringe for the pain of both needle insertion and injection (p <0.05).
CONCLUSION: The Wand technique resulted in significantly lower pain scores during the IAN block injections. Most of the patients preferred the IAN injection with the Wand for future dental injections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18791585     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  10 in total

1.  Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection Pain Using a Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Device (CCLAD): A Prospective, Randomized Study.

Authors:  Sara Fowler; Chase Crowley; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2018

2.  Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Campanella; Antonio Libonati; Roberto Nardi; Vincenzo Angotti; Gianni Gallusi; Edoardo Montemurro; Maurizio D'Amario; Giuseppe Marzo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparative evaluation of passive, active, and passive-active distraction techniques on pain perception during local anesthesia administration in children.

Authors:  Soad A Abdelmoniem; Sara A Mahmoud
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 10.479

4.  Success rate of IR midazolam sedation in combination with C-CLAD in pediatric dental patients-a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Malka Ashkenazi; Anat Baniel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery for painless anesthesia: a literature review.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Kwak; Nan-Sim Pang; Jin-Hyung Cho; Bock-Young Jung; Kee-Deog Kim; Wonse Park
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-06-30

6.  Comparison of anxiety and pain perceived with conventional and computerized local anesthesia delivery systems for different stages of anesthesia delivery in maxillary and mandibular nerve blocks.

Authors:  Kamal Aggarwal; Arundeep Kaur Lamba; Farrukh Faraz; Shruti Tandon; Kanika Makker
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-12-28

7.  Blood pressure monitoring following individual carpules of anesthetic utilizing computer-controlled anesthetic delivery.

Authors:  Kristi M Soileau; Adam E DeGenova; Qingzhao Yu
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2020-11-02

8.  Comparative evaluation of efficacy of external vibrating device and counterstimulation on child's dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthetic administration: a clinical trial.

Authors:  Varada Sahithi; Kanamarlapudi Venkata Saikiran; Mahesh Nunna; Sainath Reddy Elicherla; Ramasubba Reddy Challa; Sivakumar Nuvvula
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-07-30

9.  Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sameh Attia; Thomas Austermann; Andreas May; Mohamed Mekhemar; Jonas Conrad; Michael Knitschke; Sebastian Böttger; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Abanoub Riad
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.747

10.  Effectiveness of benzocaine in reducing deep cavity restoration and post-extraction stress in dental patients.

Authors:  Khalid H Al-Samadani; Giath Gazal
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.484

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.