Literature DB >> 18791368

Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures.

Joseph F Buell1, Mark T Thomas, Steven Rudich, Michael Marvin, Ravi Nagubandi, Kadiyala V Ravindra, Guy Brock, Kelly M McMasters.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate our experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recent data have confirmed the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive liver surgery. Despite these reports, no programmatic approach to minimally invasive liver surgery has been proposed.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent a minimally invasive procedure for the management of hepatic tumors between January 2001 and April 2008. Patients were divided into 3 groups: laparoscopy with intraoperative ultrasound and biopsy only, laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and minimally invasive resection. To compare the various forms of surgery, we analyzed the incidence of complications, tumor recurrence, mortality, and cost. Statistical analysis was performed using chi(2) analysis, Student t test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with the log-rank test, and multivariable Cox models.
RESULTS: A total of 590 minimally invasive hepatic procedures were performed during 489 operative interventions. The representative tumor histologies were: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; N = 210), colorectal carcinoma (N = 40), miscellaneous liver metastases (N = 42), biliary cancer (N = 20), and benign tumors (N = 176). Thirty-five patients underwent laparoscopic ultrasound and confirmatory biopsy alone; 201 patients underwent 240 laparoscopic RFAs, and 253 patients underwent 306 minimally invasive resections. Conversion rates to open surgery for the RFA and resection group were 2% overall. One hundred ninety-nine (40.6%) patients were cirrhotic; 31 resections were performed in cirrhotic patients. Complication and mortality rates for RFA and resection were comparable (11% vs. 16%, and 1.5% vs. 1.6%). However, complication rates (14% vs. 29%; P = 0.02) and mortality (0.3% vs. 9.7%; P = 0.006) rates were higher in the cirrhotic versus noncirrhotic resection group. Overall recurrence rates for RFA and resection groups were 24% and 23%, respectively. Local recurrence rates were higher in the RFA group (6.3% versus 1.5%; P < 0.06). Overall patient survival differed between HCC patients receiving RFA alone and those receiving RFA and OLT (P < 0.0001). Overall survival for cancer patients receiving RFA versus resection differed significantly when unadjusted for other covariates (P = 0.01), and remained marginally significant in a multivariable model (P = 0.056).
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive hepatic surgery has become a viable alternative to open hepatic surgery. Our present data are equivalent or superior to those encountered in any large open series. Our experience with RFA confirms a low local recurrence rate and an excellent technique for bridging patients to transplantation. Morbidity and mortality rates for minimally invasive hepatic resections in cirrhotics, is similar to other reported open resection series. This series confirmed excellent interim survival rates after laparoscopic HR and superiority over RFA in the treatment of cancer, with significantly lower local tumor recurrence rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18791368     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318185e647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  125 in total

1.  Differences between bipolar compression and ultrasonic devices for parenchymal transection during laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Nsehniitooh A Mbah; Russell E Brown; Matthew R Bower; Charles R Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters; Robert C G Martin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Gi Hong Choi; Sung Hoon Choi; Sung Hoon Kim; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Chang Moo Kang; Jin Sub Choi; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Non-cirrhotic liver tolerance to intermittent inflow occlusion during laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Alberto Patriti; Cecilia Ceribelli; Graziano Ceccarelli; Alberto Bartoli; Raffaele Bellochi; Luciano Casciola
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2012-03-06

Review 4.  [Value of laparoscopic liver resection].

Authors:  M R Schön
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Indications for liver surgery: laparoscopic or robotic approach.

Authors:  Stefano Amore Bonapasta; Ilenia Bartolini; Paolo Checcacci; Francesco Guerra; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-07-28

6.  Laparoscopic hepatic resection for metastatic liver tumor of colorectal cancer: comparative analysis of short- and long-term results.

Authors:  Shuichi Iwahashi; Mitsuo Shimada; Tohru Utsunomiya; Satoru Imura; Yuji Morine; Tetsuya Ikemoto; Yusuke Arakawa; Hiroki Mori; Mami Kanamoto; Shinichiro Yamada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Extracorporeal Pringle for laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Monica M Dua; David J Worhunsky; Kimberly Hwa; George A Poultsides; Jeffrey A Norton; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic bisegmentectomy 6 and 7 using a Glissonian approach and a half-Pringle maneuver.

Authors:  Paulo Herman; Jaime Krüger; Renato Lupinacci; Fabricio Coelho; Marcos Perini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopic surgery of liver tumors.

Authors:  Johanna Kirchberg; Christoph Reißfelder; Jürgen Weitz; Moritz Koch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Oncological and surgical results of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC less than 5 cm: case-matched analysis.

Authors:  Sam-Youl Yoon; Ki-Hun Kim; Dong-Hwan Jung; Ami Yu; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.