T Lorenc1, G Brunton, S Oliver, K Oliver, A Oakley. 1. Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, 18 Woburn Square, London WC1H0NR, UK. theolorenc@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Promoting walking and cycling as a part of everyday activity is seen as a strategy for tackling obesity and chronic disease. Policy needs to be based on evidence about people's views of walking and cycling as well as effects of interventions. METHODS: Studies of the views of children, young people and parents about walking and cycling were searched for systematically, and a framework analysis applied. The findings were synthesised and compared with the findings of an effectiveness review of interventions for encouraging walking and cycling as an alternative to motorised transport. RESULTS: The synthesis of views described a culture of car use, fed by a fear and dislike of local environments and parental responses that emphasised children's safety at the expense of developing their independence, despite children expressing responsible attitudes towards transport choices. Comparison with effectiveness literature found that most evaluated interventions targeted only the public's fear and dislike of local environments. CONCLUSION: Interventions need to address pedestrian and cyclist safety, perceptions of risk, and parental norms regarding children's independence.
BACKGROUND: Promoting walking and cycling as a part of everyday activity is seen as a strategy for tackling obesity and chronic disease. Policy needs to be based on evidence about people's views of walking and cycling as well as effects of interventions. METHODS: Studies of the views of children, young people and parents about walking and cycling were searched for systematically, and a framework analysis applied. The findings were synthesised and compared with the findings of an effectiveness review of interventions for encouraging walking and cycling as an alternative to motorised transport. RESULTS: The synthesis of views described a culture of car use, fed by a fear and dislike of local environments and parental responses that emphasised children's safety at the expense of developing their independence, despite children expressing responsible attitudes towards transport choices. Comparison with effectiveness literature found that most evaluated interventions targeted only the public's fear and dislike of local environments. CONCLUSION: Interventions need to address pedestrian and cyclist safety, perceptions of risk, and parental norms regarding children's independence.
Authors: David Ogilvie; Steven Cummins; Mark Petticrew; Martin White; Andy Jones; Kathryn Wheeler Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Anne C Lusk; Patrick Morency; Luis F Miranda-Moreno; Walter C Willett; Jack T Dennerlein Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Georgina Sa Trapp; Billie Giles-Corti; Hayley E Christian; Max Bulsara; Anna F Timperio; Gavin R McCormack; Karen P Villaneuva Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Xavier Bosch-Capblanch; John N Lavis; Simon Lewin; Rifat Atun; John-Arne Røttingen; Daniel Dröschel; Lise Beck; Edgardo Abalos; Fadi El-Jardali; Lucy Gilson; Sandy Oliver; Kaspar Wyss; Peter Tugwell; Regina Kulier; Tikki Pang; Andy Haines Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Dorien Simons; Peter Clarys; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Bas de Geus; Corneel Vandelanotte; Benedicte Deforche Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 3.295