Literature DB >> 18790613

Activity of voriconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole and amphotericin B in vitro against 1763 yeasts from 472 patients in the voriconazole phase III clinical studies.

Elizabeth Johnson1, Ana Espinel-Ingroff, Adrien Szekely, Hans Hockey, Peter Troke.   

Abstract

The susceptibility of 1763 yeast isolates (from 22 species and seven genera) was tested using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A2 microdilution methodology. Candida spp. predominated (97.1%), mainly C. albicans (51.4%), C. glabrata (16.4%) and C. tropicalis (13.7%), followed by Trichosporon spp. (1.1%) and Cryptococcus neoformans (1.0%). Most isolates came from blood/catheters (72.0%) or the oesophagus/oropharynx (11.3%). The voriconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole and amphotericin B MIC90 values (minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of the isolates) for all isolates were 1.0, 2.0, 64 and 1.0 microg/mL, respectively. Voriconazole MICs correlated with those for fluconazole (r = 0.91) and itraconazole (r = 0.90). Only 109 isolates (6.2%) had voriconazole MICs > or = 4.0 microg/mL; all were C. albicans, C. glabrata or C. tropicalis resistant to itraconazole (and most to fluconazole). Isolates from 22 patients with amphotericin MICs > or = 2.0 microg/mL (range 2.0-16.0 microg/mL) were also cross-resistant to one or more of the triazoles. Patients (n = 34) with voriconazole-resistant isolates showed a 56% response to voriconazole therapy, and those patients (n = 261) with susceptible isolates showed a 71% response. Twenty-three voriconazole-treated patients had baseline resistant isolates, in eight patients voriconazole resistance developed during therapy and in three patients a different resistant species arose during therapy. Thus, voriconazole MICs correlate with those of fluconazole and itraconazole and may predict clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18790613     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  13 in total

1.  On track to limit antifungal overuse!

Authors:  Philippe Eggimann; Frédéric Lamoth; Oscar Marchetti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  In Vitro Susceptibility Testing in Fungi: What is its Role in Clinical Practice?

Authors:  Susanne Perkhofer; Cornelia Mrazek; Lukas Hartl; Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Multilaboratory study of epidemiological cutoff values for detection of resistance in eight Candida species to fluconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; M A Pfaller; B Bustamante; E Canton; A Fothergill; J Fuller; G M Gonzalez; C Lass-Flörl; S R Lockhart; E Martin-Mazuelos; J F Meis; M S C Melhem; L Ostrosky-Zeichner; T Pelaez; M W Szeszs; G St-Germain; L X Bonfietti; J Guarro; J Turnidge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Cytotoxicity of voriconazole on cultured human corneal endothelial cells.

Authors:  Sang Beom Han; Young Joo Shin; Joon Young Hyon; Won Ryang Wee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Observational study of the clinical efficacy of voriconazole and its relationship to plasma concentrations in patients.

Authors:  Peter F Troke; Hans P Hockey; William W Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2007: a 10.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida Species to fluconazole and voriconazole as determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema; D L Gibbs; V A Newell; D Ellis; V Tullio; A Rodloff; W Fu; T A Ling
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of in vitro antifungal activities of efinaconazole and currently available antifungal agents against a variety of pathogenic fungi associated with onychomycosis.

Authors:  William J Jo Siu; Yoshiyuki Tatsumi; Hisato Senda; Radhakrishnan Pillai; Takashi Nakamura; Daisuke Sone; Annette Fothergill
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparison of 24-hour and 48-hour voriconazole MICs as determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method (M27-A3 document) in three laboratories: results obtained with 2,162 clinical isolates of Candida spp. and other yeasts.

Authors:  Ana Espinel-Ingroff; E Canton; J Peman; M G Rinaldi; A W Fothergill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Examination of potential virulence factors of Candida tropicalis clinical isolates from hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Melyssa Negri; Margarida Martins; Mariana Henriques; Terezinha I E Svidzinski; Joana Azeredo; Rosário Oliveira
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 10.  Cryptococcosis: epidemiology, fungal resistance, and new alternatives for treatment.

Authors:  F P Gullo; S A Rossi; J de C O Sardi; V L I Teodoro; M J S Mendes-Giannini; A M Fusco-Almeida
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.