Literature DB >> 18790064

Graph-partitioned spatial priors for functional magnetic resonance images.

L M Harrison1, W Penny, G Flandin, C C Ruff, N Weiskopf, K J Friston.   

Abstract

Spatial models of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data allow one to estimate the spatial smoothness of general linear model (GLM) parameters and eschew pre-process smoothing of data entailed by conventional mass-univariate analyses. Recently diffusion-based spatial priors [Harrison, L.M., Penny, W., Daunizeau, J., and Friston, K.J. (2008). Diffusion-based spatial priors for functional magnetic resonance images. NeuroImage.] were proposed, which provide a way to formulate an adaptive spatial basis, where the diffusion kernel of a weighted graph-Laplacian (WGL) is used as the prior covariance matrix over GLM parameters. An advantage of these is that they can be used to relax the assumption of isotropy and stationarity implicit in smoothing data with a fixed Gaussian kernel. The limitation of diffusion-based models is purely computational, due to the large number of voxels in a brain volume. One solution is to partition a brain volume into slices, using a spatial model for each slice. This reduces computational burden by approximating the full WGL with a block diagonal form, where each block can be analysed separately. While fMRI data are collected in slices, the functional structures exhibiting spatial coherence and continuity are generally three-dimensional, calling for a more informed partition. We address this using the graph-Laplacian to divide a brain volume into sub-graphs, whose shape can be arbitrary. Their shape depends crucially on edge weights of the graph, which can be based on the Euclidean distance between voxels (isotropic) or on GLM parameters (anisotropic) encoding functional responses. The result is an approximation the full WGL that retains its 3D form and also has potential for parallelism. We applied the method to high-resolution (1 mm(3)) fMRI data and compared models where a volume was divided into either slices or graph-partitions. Models were optimized using Expectation-Maximization and the approximate log-evidence computed to compare these different ways to partition a spatial prior. The high-resolution fMRI data presented here had greatest evidence for the graph partitioned anisotropic model, which was best able to preserve fine functional detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18790064      PMCID: PMC2643838          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  29 in total

1.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction.

Authors:  J B Tenenbaum; V de Silva; J C Langford
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Dealing with the shortcomings of spatial normalization: multi-subject parcellation of fMRI datasets.

Authors:  Bertrand Thirion; Guillaume Flandin; Philippe Pinel; Alexis Roche; Philippe Ciuciu; Jean-Baptiste Poline
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Spatial smoothing of autocorrelations to control the degrees of freedom in fMRI analysis.

Authors:  K J Worsley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Bayesian fMRI data analysis with sparse spatial basis function priors.

Authors:  Guillaume Flandin; William D Penny
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Automatic segmentation of left and right cerebral hemispheres from MRI brain volumes using the graph cuts algorithm.

Authors:  Lichen Liang; Kelly Rehm; Roger P Woods; David A Rottenberg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Bayesian comparison of spatially regularised general linear models.

Authors:  Will Penny; Guillaume Flandin; Nelson Trujillo-Barreto
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Random walks for image segmentation.

Authors:  Leo Grady
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.226

9.  Adaptive segmentation of MRI data.

Authors:  W M Wells; W L Grimson; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  When fear is near: threat imminence elicits prefrontal-periaqueductal gray shifts in humans.

Authors:  Dean Mobbs; Predrag Petrovic; Jennifer L Marchant; Demis Hassabis; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Ben Seymour; Raymond J Dolan; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Time series analysis of fMRI data: Spatial modelling and Bayesian computation.

Authors:  Ming Teng; Timothy D Johnson; Farouk S Nathoo
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Time scales of representation in the human brain: weighing past information to predict future events.

Authors:  Lee M Harrison; Sven Bestmann; Maria Joao Rosa; William Penny; Gary G R Green
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.