Literature DB >> 18789829

Inter- and intraobserver variation in HR-CTV contouring: intercomparison of transverse and paratransverse image orientation in 3D-MRI assisted cervix cancer brachytherapy.

Primoz Petric1, Johannes Dimopoulos, Christian Kirisits, Daniel Berger, Robert Hudej, Richard Pötter.   

Abstract

AIM: To analyze agreement between target volumes, delineated by two observers on transverse (T) and paratransverse (perpendicular to the long cervical axis - PT) MR images for cervix cancer brachytherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 13 patients, High Risk-CTV (HR-CTV) was outlined by two observers in T and PT MR image plane, respecting the GYN GEC-ESTRO recommendations for 3D-image based cervix cancer brachytherapy [1]. Contouring time was measured. HR-CTV sizes were compared, and conformity index (CI) was assessed. Interobserver variations in contour-extent along eight radial directions were compared between delineation planes. After applying a standard treatment plan, an intercomparison of DVH-parameters V100, D90, and D100 for the HR-CTV was carried out.
RESULTS: Contouring time was slightly longer in T than PT orientation. Interplane CI did not differ significantly between observers (0.72 vs. 0.71), nor did the interobserver CI between planes (0.79 vs. 0.78). Variations in contour-extent between different radial directions and interplane deviations in DVH parameters were non-significant.
CONCLUSION: Contouring in PT, as compared to T plane, allows for a "circumferential view of the cervix" and facilitates comprehensive understanding of spatial relations between the applicator and patho-anatomical structures. It is marked by a lower contouring difficulty and leads to a comparable outcome in terms of DVH parameters. Interobserver inconsistencies can be minimized by systematic training and following the published recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18789829     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  21 in total

1.  Quantifying the dosimetric impact of organ-at-risk delineation variability in head and neck radiation therapy in the context of patient setup uncertainty.

Authors:  Eric Aliotta; Hamidreza Nourzadeh; Jeffrey Siebers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  MRI-based pre-planning in patients with cervical cancer treated with three-dimensional brachytherapy.

Authors:  M Dolezel; K Odrazka; J Vanasek; T Kohlova; T Kroulik; K Kudelka; D Spitzer; M Mrklovsky; M Tichy; J Zizka; L Jalcova
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Coverage-based treatment planning to accommodate delineation uncertainties in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Huijun Xu; J James Gordon; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comparison and consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for CT- and MR-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Akila N Viswanathan; Beth Erickson; David K Gaffney; Sushil Beriwal; Sudershan K Bhatia; Omer Lee Burnett; David P D'Souza; Nikhilesh Patil; Michael G Haddock; Anuja Jhingran; Ellen L Jones; Charles A Kunos; Larissa J Lee; Lilie L Lin; Nina A Mayr; Ivy Petersen; Primoz Petric; Lorraine Portelance; William Small; Jonathan B Strauss; Kanokpis Townamchai; Aaron H Wolfson; Catheryn M Yashar; Walter Bosch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Uterine perforation - 5-year experience in 3-D image guided gynaecological brachytherapy at Institute of Oncology Ljubljana.

Authors:  Barbara Segedin; Jasenka Gugic; Primoz Petric
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Comparison of conventional and CT-based planning for intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: target volume coverage and organs at risk doses.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Gungor Arslan; Erkan Topkan; Berrin Pehlivan; Melek Yavuz; Ezgi Oymak; Aydin Yavuz
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-01

7.  Distance deviation measure of contouring variability.

Authors:  Peter Rogelj; Robert Hudej; Primoz Petric
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  A multicentre comparison of the dosimetric impact of inter- and intra-fractional anatomical variations in fractionated cervix cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Nicole Nesvacil; Kari Tanderup; Taran P Hellebust; Astrid De Leeuw; Stefan Lang; Sandy Mohamed; Swamidas V Jamema; Clare Anderson; Richard Pötter; Christian Kirisits
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 9.  Development of an expert system as a diagnostic support of cervical cancer in atypical glandular cells, based on fuzzy logics and image interpretation.

Authors:  Karem R Domínguez Hernández; Alberto A Aguilar Lasserre; Rubén Posada Gómez; José A Palet Guzmán; Blanca E González Sánchez
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Comparison of 3D MRI with high sampling efficiency and 2D multiplanar MRI for contouring in cervix cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Primoz Petric; Robert Hudej; Peter Rogelj; Mateja Blas; Barbara Segedin; Helena Barbara Zobec Logar; Johannes Carl Athanasios Dimopoulos
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.