Literature DB >> 18789740

Regional variation in the denial of reimbursement for bone mineral density testing among US Medicare beneficiaries.

Jeffrey R Curtis1, Andrew J Laster, David J Becker, Laura Carbone, Lisa C Gary, Meredith L Kilgore, Robert Matthews, Michael A Morrisey, Kenneth G Saag, S Bobo Tanner, Elizabeth Delzell.   

Abstract

Although the Bone Mass Measurement Act outlines the indications for central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing for US Medicare beneficiaries, the specifics regarding the appropriate ICD-9 codes to use for covered indications have not been specified by Medicare and are sometimes ambiguous. We describe the extent to which DXA reimbursement was denied by gender and age of beneficiary, ICD-9 code submitted, time since previous DXA, whether the scan was performed in the physician's office and local Medicare carrier. Using Medicare administrative claims data from 1999 to 2005, we studied a 5% national sample of beneficiaries age > or =65 yr with part A+B coverage who were not health maintenance organization enrollees. We identified central DXA claims and evaluated the relationship between the factors listed above and reimbursement for central DXA (CPT code 76075). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent relationship between DXA reimbursement, ICD-9 diagnosis code, and Medicare carrier. For persons who had no DXA in 1999 or 2000 and who had 1 in 2001 or 2002, the proportion of DXA claims denied was 5.3% for women and 9.1% for men. For repeat DXAs performed within 23 mo, the proportion denied was approximately 19% and did not differ by sex. Reimbursement varied by more than 6-fold according to the ICD-9 diagnosis code submitted. For repeat DXAs performed at <23 mo, the proportion of claims denied ranged from 2% to 43%, depending on Medicare carrier. Denial of Medicare reimbursement for DXA varies significantly by sex, time since previous DXA, ICD-9 diagnosis code submitted, place of service (office vs facility), and local Medicare carrier. Greater guidance and transparency in coding policies are needed to ensure that DXA as a covered service is reimbursed for Medicare beneficiaries with the appropriate indications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18789740      PMCID: PMC3429135          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2008.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  4 in total

1.  Variation in Medicare's local coverage policies: content analysis of local medical review policies.

Authors:  Susan Bartlett Foote; Rachel Halpern; Douglas R Wholey
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Cost-effectiveness of bone densitometry followed by treatment of osteoporosis in older men.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Brent C Taylor; Howard A Fink; Robert L Kane; Steven R Cummings; Eric S Orwoll; L Joseph Melton; Douglas C Bauer; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Understanding the Bone Mass Measurement Act.

Authors:  N B Watts
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 4.  Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  Edward S Leib; E Michael Lewiecki; Neil Binkley; Ronald C Hamdy
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Patterns of bone mineral density testing in men receiving androgen deprivation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vahakn B Shahinian; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States.

Authors:  J R Curtis; A Laster; D J Becker; L Carbone; L C Gary; M L Kilgore; R S Matthews; M A Morrisey; K G Saag; S B Tanner; E Delzell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Adherence to osteoporosis treatments: room for improvement.

Authors:  Amy H Warriner; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of pragmatic clinical trials in older adults in the United States.

Authors:  Kenneth G Saag; Penny E Mohr; Laura Esmail; Amy S Mudano; Nicole Wright; Timothy Beukelman; Jeffrey R Curtis; Gary Cutter; Elizabeth Delzell; Lisa C Gary; T Michael Harrington; Swapna Karkare; Meredith L Kilgore; Cora Elizabeth Lewis; Rachael Moloney; Ana Oliveira; Jasvinder A Singh; Amy Warriner; Jie Zhang; Marc Berger; Steven R Cummings; Wilson Pace; Daniel H Solomon; Robert Wallace; Sean R Tunis
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Factors Associated With Osteoporosis Care of Men Hospitalized for Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Samantha L Solimeo; Kimberly McCoy; Heather Schacht Reisinger; Robert A Adler; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2019-06-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.