Literature DB >> 18789533

A randomized trial of near versus distance activities while patching for amblyopia in children aged 3 to less than 7 years.

.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether performing near activities while patching for amblyopia enhances improvement in visual acuity.
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 425 children, aged 3 to <7 years, with amblyopia (20/40-20/400) that was caused by anisometropia, strabismus, or both, and that persisted after treatment with spectacles.
METHODS: Children were randomized to 2 hours of patching per day with near activities or 2 hours of patching per day with distance activities. Instruction sheets describing common near and distance activities were given to the parents. Study visits were scheduled at 2, 5, 8, and 17 weeks. In weeks without a visit, weekly telephone calls were made to the parent to monitor and encourage compliance during the first 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Masked assessment of visual acuity by isolated crowded HOTV optotypes at 8 weeks.
RESULTS: At 8 weeks, improvement in amblyopic eye visual acuity averaged 2.6 lines in the distance activities group and 2.5 lines in the near activities group (mean difference in acuity between groups, adjusted for baseline acuity, 0.0 lines 95% confidence interval, -0.3 to 0.3). The 2 groups also appeared statistically similar at the 2-, 5-, and 17-week visits. At the 17-week examination, children with severe amblyopia improved a mean of 3.6 lines with 2 hours of daily patching.
CONCLUSIONS: Performing common near activities does not improve visual acuity outcome when treating anisometropic, strabismic, or combined amblyopia with 2 hours of daily patching. Children with severe amblyopia may respond to 2 hours of daily patching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18789533      PMCID: PMC2615691          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.06.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  10 in total

1.  Computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

Authors:  P S Moke; A H Turpin; R W Beck; J M Holmes; M X Repka; E E Birch; R W Hertle; R T Kraker; J M Miller; C A Johnson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  The amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

Authors:  J M Holmes; R W Beck; M X Repka; D A Leske; R T Kraker; R C Blair; P S Moke; E E Birch; R A Saunders; R W Hertle; G E Quinn; K A Simons; J M Miller
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09

3.  Comparative study of amblyopic treatment.

Authors:  J FRANCOIS; M JAMES
Journal:  Am Orthopt J       Date:  1955

4.  Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children with refractive correction.

Authors:  Susan A Cotter; Allison R Edwards; David K Wallace; Roy W Beck; Robert W Arnold; William F Astle; Carmen N Barnhardt; Eileen E Birch; Sean P Donahue; Donald F Everett; Joost Felius; Jonathan M Holmes; Raymond T Kraker; Michele Melia; Michael X Repka; Nicholas A Sala; David I Silbert; Katherine K Weise
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  A comparison of various methods of treatment of amblyopia. A block study.

Authors:  P G Watson; A S Sanac; M S Pickering
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1985

6.  WP, Berry D: The value of visual stimulation during contact and direct occlusion.

Authors:  W P Callahan
Journal:  Am Orthopt J       Date:  1968

7.  Home therapy for amblyopia.

Authors:  G K Von Noorden; F Springer; P Romano; M Parks
Journal:  Am Orthopt J       Date:  1970

8.  A randomized pilot study of near activities versus non-near activities during patching therapy for amblyopia.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; Allison R Edwards; Roy W Beck; Robert W Arnold; David A Johnson; Deborah L Klimek; Raymond T Kraker; Katherine A Lee; Don W Lyon; Erin R Nosel; Michael X Repka; Nicholas A Sala; David I Silbert; Susanna Tamkins
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.220

9.  A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens for treatment of severe amblyopia in children.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; Raymond T Kraker; Roy W Beck; Eileen E Birch; Susan A Cotter; Donald F Everett; Richard W Hertle; Graham E Quinn; Michael X Repka; Mitchell M Scheiman; David K Wallace
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; Roy W Beck; Jonathan M Holmes; Eileen E Birch; Danielle L Chandler; Susan A Cotter; Richard W Hertle; Raymond T Kraker; Pamela S Moke; Graham E Quinn; Mitchell M Scheiman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05
  10 in total
  20 in total

Review 1.  Amblyopia.

Authors:  Stephanie West; Cathy Williams
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-06-30

Review 2.  The treatment of amblyopia: current practice and emerging trends.

Authors:  Eleni Papageorgiou; Ioannis Asproudis; Gail Maconachie; Evangelia E Tsironi; Irene Gottlob
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Designing clinical trials for amblyopia.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Stereoacuity in children with anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  David K Wallace; Elizabeth L Lazar; Michele Melia; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes; Kristine B Hopkins; Raymond T Kraker; Marjean T Kulp; Yi Pang; Michael X Repka; Susanna M Tamkins; Katherine K Weise
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Effect of age on response to amblyopia treatment in children.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; Elizabeth L Lazar; B Michele Melia; William F Astle; Linda R Dagi; Sean P Donahue; Marcela G Frazier; Richard W Hertle; Michael X Repka; Graham E Quinn; Katherine K Weise
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-11

6.  Time course and predictors of amblyopia improvement with 2 hours of daily patching.

Authors:  David K Wallace; Elizabeth L Lazar; Earl R Crouch; Darren L Hoover; Raymond T Kraker; Susanna M Tamkins
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  The Amblyopia Treatment Studies: Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Angela M Chen; Susan A Cotter
Journal:  Adv Ophthalmol Optom       Date:  2016-08

8.  A Randomized Trial of Binocular Dig Rush Game Treatment for Amblyopia in Children Aged 7 to 12 Years.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; Ruth E Manny; Elizabeth L Lazar; Eileen E Birch; Krista R Kelly; Allison I Summers; Stacy R Martinson; Aparna Raghuram; Jeffrey D Colburn; Christine Law; Justin D Marsh; Derek P Bitner; Raymond T Kraker; David K Wallace
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  A randomized trial of increasing patching for amblyopia.

Authors:  David K Wallace; Elizabeth L Lazar; Jonathan M Holmes; Michael X Repka; Susan A Cotter; Angela M Chen; Raymond T Kraker; Roy W Beck; Michael P Clarke; Ingryd J Lorenzana; David B Petersen; Joan T Roberts; Donny W Suh
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Effect of a Binocular iPad Game vs Part-time Patching in Children Aged 5 to 12 Years With Amblyopia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; Vivian M Manh; Elizabeth L Lazar; Roy W Beck; Eileen E Birch; Raymond T Kraker; Eric R Crouch; S Ayse Erzurum; Nausheen Khuddus; Allison I Summers; David K Wallace
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 7.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.