| Literature DB >> 18789149 |
Bence György1, László Tóthfalusi, György Nagy, Mária Pásztói, Pál Géher, Zsolt Lörinc, Anna Polgár, Bernadett Rojkovich, Ilona Ujfalussy, Gyula Poór, Péter Pócza, Zoltán Wiener, Petra Misják, Agnes Koncz, András Falus, Edit I Buzás.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although natural autoantibodies make up the majority of circulating immunoglobulins and are also present in high numbers in therapeutically used intravenous immunoglobulin preparations, they have received little attention and their precise role remains largely unknown. An increasing awareness of the importance of posttranslational autoantigen modifications and glycobiology led us to explore carbohydrate-reactive natural autoantibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This study examined systematic antibodies reactive to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), the carbohydrate components of proteoglycans that are released in large amounts from degrading cartilage.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18789149 PMCID: PMC2592792 DOI: 10.1186/ar2507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthritis Res Ther ISSN: 1478-6354 Impact factor: 5.156
Anti-glycosaminoglycan antibody concentrations
| 1.63 ± 0.3 | 750.95 ± 343.1 | 1225.27 ± 354.2 | |
| 1.36 ± 0.2 | 608.00 ± 302.3 | 1300.61 ± 389.2 | |
| 1.73 ± 0.4 | 673.70 ± 305.7 | 1964.34 ± 461.7 | |
| 1.63 ± 0.2 | 275.11 ± 184.5 | 836.87 ± 321.3 | |
| 2.27 ± 0.4 | 1115.91 ± 383.0 | 2605.36 ± 516.8 | |
| 1.27 ± 0.2 | 4.32 ± 0.9 | 14.18 ± 4.5 | |
| 1.54 ± 0.4 | 203.09 ± 89.1 | 872.79 ± 310.7 | |
| 1.77 ± 0.8 | 508.07 ± 215.9 | 1551.62 ± 417.2 | |
| 1.27 ± 0.1 | 241.53 ± 176.3 | 717.86 ± 273.3 | |
| 4.91 ± 4.3 | 1871.63 ± 481.1 | 2704.11 ± 525.2 | |
| 4.05 ± 3.8 | 1066.59 ± 326.7 | 2689.71 ± 515.8 | |
| 1.09 ± 0.2 | 960.93 ± 365.3 | 1227.82 ± 379.3 |
Mean antibody concentrations are expressed in μg/mL. The difference between serum anti-glycosaminoglycan (GAG) antibody levels of controls and umbilical cord samples was significant (three-way analysis of variance [ANOVA], F = 110.70; DF = 1.77; p < 0.001). The difference between RA patients and adult controls was also highly significant (three-factor ANOVA, F = 30.17 DF = 1.11 p < 0.001), and independent from type of the antigen and from the type of the antibody as well.
Figure 1Correlation between serum and synovial fluid anti-glycosaminoglycan (GAG) IgM and IgG antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Note the strong and statistically significant correlation (p < 0.001) between the corresponding IgM anti-GAG concentrations in serum and synovial fluid samples. Such a relation could not be demonstrated for IgG antibodies (r = 0.13, N.S).
Figure 2Scatter plot of anti-glycosaminoglycan (GAG) antibody concentrations. Log-transformed antibody concentrations were plotted against each other. Figure 2 suggests that there is a strong relation between anti-GAG antibody concentrations, particularly among IgM molecules. This observation has been confirmed by detailed statistical analysis, and the lowest value of the correlation coefficients between anti-GAG IgM antibodies was 0.86. The concentrations are expressed in μg/mL.
Figure 3Correlation of anti-chondroitin sulphate C IgM levels with the disease and activity markers in rheumatoid arthritis. (a) Box plots of anti-chondroitin sulphate (CS) C IgM concentrations groups of controls and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The logarithm of the anti-CSC IgM concentration is plotted. The lines inside the boxes denote the medians. The boxes mark the interval between the 25th and 75th percentiles. The ends of the vertical lines or whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum data values, unless outliers are present in which case the whiskers extend to a maximum of 1.5 times the interquartile range. The difference between the controls (n = 55) and RA patients (n = 66) is statistically significant (p < 0.02, F-test). (b) Box plots of anti-CSC IgM concentrations in groups of controls and the patients with RA. Patients are stratified according to disease activitity scores (DAS) 28. Patients classified to DAS 1 group (n = 6) have significantly higher anti-CSC IgM concentrations compared with controls and to patients in the DAS 2 (n = 22) and 3 (n = 18) categories. No other significant differences have been found (p < 0.05, post-hoc Tukey's test). Result suggests that anti-CSC IgM is not a disease, but a state dependent marker. (c) Comparison of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients according to their DAS scores. On the vertical axis the logarithm of CRP concentration is plotted. The only significant difference was found between groups DAS 1 and 3 (p < 0.05, post-hoc Tukey's test). (d) Box plots of anti-CSC IgM concentrations in groups of controls and patients with RA. Patients were stratified according to their CRP values into three subgroups: those having low, moderate or high CRP values (n = 17, n = 16 and n = 16, respectively). The anti-CSC IgM titre decreases when CRP concentration increases; the difference between the low and high CRP group is statistically significant (p < 0.05, post-hoc Tukey's test).
Figure 4Detection of anti-glycosaminoglycan (GAG) antibody binding to the extracellular matrix of hyaline cartilage. Microphotograph (a) shows the binding of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) serum-derived antibodies to human cartilage. The reactivity could be inhibited by pre-incubation of the serum sample with chondroitin sulphate (CS) C. (b) is using 2 mg/ml CSC; (c) is using 4 mg/ml CSC as an inhibitor). Magnification: 100×