Literature DB >> 18788907

Multi-break rearrangements and breakpoint re-uses: from circular to linear genomes.

Max A Alekseyev1.   

Abstract

Multi-break rearrangements break a genome into multiple fragments and further glue them together in a new order. While 2-break rearrangements represent standard reversals, fusions, fissions, and translocations, 3-break rearrangements represent a natural generalization of transpositions. Alekseyev and Pevzner (2007a, 2008a) studied multi-break rearrangements in circular genomes and further applied them to the analysis of chromosomal evolution in mammalian genomes. In this paper, we extend these results to the more difficult case of linear genomes. In particular, we give lower bounds for the rearrangement distance between linear genomes and for the breakpoint re-use rate as functions of the number and proportion of transpositions. We further use these results to analyze comparative genomic architecture of mammalian genomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18788907     DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2008.0080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  8 in total

1.  Anchoring the dog to its relatives reveals new evolutionary breakpoints across 11 species of the Canidae and provides new clues for the role of B chromosomes.

Authors:  Shannon E Duke Becker; Rachael Thomas; Vladimir A Trifonov; Robert K Wayne; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Matthew Breen
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Random matrix approach to the distribution of genomic distance.

Authors:  Nikita Alexeev; Peter Zograf
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Breakpoint graphs and ancestral genome reconstructions.

Authors:  Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement.

Authors:  Aaron E Darling; Bob Mau; Nicole T Perna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Phylogenetic analysis of genome rearrangements among five mammalian orders.

Authors:  Haiwei Luo; William Arndt; Yiwei Zhang; Guanqun Shi; Max A Alekseyev; Jijun Tang; Austin L Hughes; Robert Friedman
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.286

6.  Comparative genomics reveals birth and death of fragile regions in mammalian evolution.

Authors:  Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Estimation of the true evolutionary distance under the fragile breakage model.

Authors:  Nikita Alexeev; Max A Alekseyev
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  On pairwise distances and median score of three genomes under DCJ.

Authors:  Sergey Aganezov; Max A Alekseyev
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.