Literature DB >> 18788869

Comparative osseous and soft tissue morphology following cleft lip repair.

Lynn M Seidenstricker-Kink1, Devra B Becker, Daniel P Govier, Valerie B DeLeon, Lun-Jou Lo, Alex A Kane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify comparative improvement between osseous and soft tissue asymmetry following primary lip repair.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans of infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Sixteen soft tissue landmarks were placed using an exploratory two-/three-dimensional image processing system and compared for asymmetry. PATIENTS: Computed tomography scans were obtained on 26 patients (13 boys, 13 girls) of Chinese ethnicity (mean age = 0.25 years) prior to Millard lip repair. Nineteen of these contributed to follow-up comparative studies prior to palatoplasty at a mean age of 0.92 years. There were 18 left-sided and eight right-sided clefts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Euclidean distance matrix asymmetry analysis was used to determine the amount of soft tissue asymmetry pre- and postlip repair. Similar analyses of the same scans were performed for 41 osseous landmarks.
RESULTS: Soft tissue landmarks had 36/39 (92%) preoperative and 13/39 (33%) postoperative asymmetric pairs. Osseous distances demonstrated 77/125 (61%) asymmetric pairs preoperatively and 60/125 (48%) postoperatively. Soft tissue and osseous distances of the lip region demonstrated 32% and 39% postoperative asymmetry, respectively. Soft tissue and osseous distances of the nasal region demonstrated 52% and 72% postoperative asymmetry, respectively. Soft tissue and osseous distances of the facial landmarks demonstrated 24% and 34% postoperative asymmetry, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary lip repair appears to effect gains in symmetry in soft tissue and provides sufficient molding forces to cause correlating symmetry changes in underlying osseous structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18788869     DOI: 10.1597/07-001.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  4 in total

1.  Morphological integration of the skull in craniofacial anomalies.

Authors:  J T Richtsmeier; V B Deleon
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 2.  Methods to quantify soft-tissue based facial growth and treatment outcomes in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sander Brons; Machteld E van Beusichem; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Jos Draaisma; Stefaan J Bergé; Thomas J Maal; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Nostril Morphometry Evaluation before and after Cleft Lip Surgical Correction: Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Mario Jorge Frassy Feijo; Stella Ramos Brandão; Rui Manoel Rodrigues Pereira; Mariana Batista de Souza Santos; Hilton Justino da Silva
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-06

4.  Outcome of facial contour asymmetry after conventional two-dimensional versus computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in cleft orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Po-Jung Hsu; Rafael Denadai; Betty C J Pai; Hsiu-Hsia Lin; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.