Literature DB >> 18787948

Clinical significance of axillary nodal ratio in stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Bhumsuk Keam1, Seock-Ah Im, Hee-Jun Kim, Do-Youn Oh, Jee Hyun Kim, Se-Hoon Lee, Eui Kyu Chie, Wonshik Han, Dong-Wan Kim, Nariya Cho, Woo Kyung Moon, Tae-You Kim, In Ae Park, Dong-Young Noh, Dae Seog Heo, Sung Whan Ha, Yung-Jue Bang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may modify the yield of involved axillary lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to identify the clinical significance of the involved nodal ratios in patients with stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS: Two hundred and five stage II and III breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative surgery, either breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection, and received three additional cycles of docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy as adjuvant. Adjuvant radiotherapy and hormonal therapy were given after adjuvant chemotherapy when indicated.
RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 28.9 months. The overall response rate (RR) for neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 77.6%. The mean nodal ratio was 0.29 (range, 0-1.0; nodal ratio <or=0.25, 121 [59.0%] vs. >0.25, 84 [41.0%]). Relapse free survival (RFS) of the patients who had a nodal ratio >0.25 was significantly shorter (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 2.701, P = 0.001). A nodal ratio >0.25 was also associated with a shorter overall survival (OS) (HR = 4.109, P = 0.006). However, RFS and OS were not different according to the absolute number of involved nodes (ANIN) (P = 0.166, P = 0.248, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the nodal ratio was an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS (HR = 4.246, P < 0.001; HR = 7.764, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Axillary nodal ratios have an independent prognostic value in stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nodal ratio might be a useful tool to identify the patients at high risk of relapse in the neoadjuvant setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18787948     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0160-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  20 in total

1.  Clinical outcome of central nervous system metastases from breast cancer: differences in survival depending on systemic treatment.

Authors:  Hee-Jun Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Bhumsuk Keam; Yu-Jung Kim; Sae-Won Han; Tae Min Kim; Do-Youn Oh; Jee Hyun Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Eui Kyu Chie; Wonshik Han; Dong-Wan Kim; Tae-You Kim; Dong-Young Noh; Dae Seog Heo; In Ae Park; Yung-Jue Bang; Sung Whan Ha
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Nomogram predicting clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Bhumsuk Keam; Seock-Ah Im; Sohee Park; Byung-Ho Nam; Sae-Won Han; Do-Youn Oh; Jee Hyun Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Wonshik Han; Dong-Wan Kim; Tae-You Kim; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Dae Seog Heo; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Age and axillary lymph node ratio in postmenopausal women with T1-T2 node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Vincent Vinh-Hung; Sue A Joseph; Nadege Coutty; Bevan Hong Ly; Georges Vlastos; Nam Phong Nguyen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-10-07

4.  Axillary lymph node status, adjusted for pathologic complete response in breast and axilla after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, predicts differential disease-free survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  G C Zhang; Y F Zhang; F P Xu; X K Qian; Z B Guo; C Y Ren; M Yao
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Does the axillary lymph node ratio have any added prognostic value over pN staging for South East Asian breast cancer patients?

Authors:  Nakul Saxena; Mikael Hartman; Cheng-Har Yip; Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy; Lay Wai Khin; Nur Aishah Taib; Lai-Meng Looi; Siew-Eng Lim; Soo-Chin Lee; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Issues related to sentinel lymph node assessment in the management of breast cancer-what are relevant in pathology reports?

Authors:  Patricia Tai; Kurian J Joseph; Edward Yu
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2011-03-15

7.  Ki-67 can be used for further classification of triple negative breast cancer into two subtypes with different response and prognosis.

Authors:  Bhumsuk Keam; Seock-Ah Im; Kyung-Hun Lee; Sae-Won Han; Do-Youn Oh; Jee Hyun Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Wonshik Han; Dong-Wan Kim; Tae-You Kim; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Dae Seog Heo; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Early metabolic response using FDG PET/CT and molecular phenotypes of breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Bhumsuk Keam; Seock-Ah Im; Youngil Koh; Sae-Won Han; Do-Youn Oh; Nariya Cho; Jee Hyun Kim; Wonshik Han; Keon Wook Kang; Woo Kyung Moon; Tae-You Kim; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; June-Key Chung; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Detection of prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Mehdi Tazhibi; Mahsa Fayaz; Fariborz Mokarian
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Locoregional Recurrence Risk in Breast Cancer Patients with Estrogen Receptor Positive Tumors and Residual Nodal Disease following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Mastectomy without Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Shravan Kandula; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Saul Harari; Carolina Fasola; Donna Mister; David S Yu; Amelia B Zelnak; Mylin A Torres
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.