Literature DB >> 18787530

Balancing early market access to new drugs with the need for benefit/risk data: a mounting dilemma.

Hans-Georg Eichler1, Francesco Pignatti, Bruno Flamion, Hubert Leufkens, Alasdair Breckenridge.   

Abstract

Drug regulatory agencies are increasingly pressed by the challenge of finding the appropriate balance between the need for rapid access to new drugs and the need to ensure comprehensive data on their benefits and risks. This dilemma is not new, but has been made more prominent by recent high-profile drug withdrawals and conflicting demands, including the need to improve the efficiency of drug development on one hand, and the need to avoid exposing patients to unnecessary risks or possibly ineffective treatments on the other. Here, we summarize the current demands by stakeholders and the scientific and regulatory issues at stake, describe existing and emerging regulatory approaches, and speculate on future directions, such as evolution of the current regulatory model from a one-off marketing authorization to a life-cycle approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18787530     DOI: 10.1038/nrd2664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov        ISSN: 1474-1776            Impact factor:   84.694


  54 in total

1.  The dilemma between efficacy as defined by regulatory bodies and effectiveness in clinical practice.

Authors:  Gerd Glaeske
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  New drug approval success rate in Europe in 2009.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Eichler; Bo Aronsson; Eric Abadie; Tomas Salmonson
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Regulating medicines in Croatia: five-year experience of Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices.

Authors:  Sinisa Tomić; Anita Filipović Sucić; Ana Plazonić; Rajka Truban Zulj; Viola Macolić Sarinić; Branka Cudina; Adrijana Ilić Martinac
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.351

4.  A decade of safety-related regulatory action in the Netherlands: a retrospective analysis of direct healthcare professional communications from 1999 to 2009.

Authors:  Peter G M Mol; Sabine M J M Straus; Sigrid Piening; Jonie T N de Vries; Pieter A de Graeff; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Evolution of regulatory frameworks.

Authors:  Alasdair Breckenridge; Peter Feldschreiber; Simon Gregor; June Raine; Leigh-Ann Mulcahy
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Regulatory review of novel therapeutics--comparison of three regulatory agencies.

Authors:  Nicholas S Downing; Jenerius A Aminawung; Nilay D Shah; Joel B Braunstein; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The good, the bad and the ugly red tape of biomedical research. How could regulators lower bureaucratic hurdles in clinical research without compromising the safety of patients?

Authors:  Mark Greener
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Research ethics. Rethinking research ethics: the case of postmarketing trials.

Authors:  Alex John London; Jonathan Kimmelman; Benjamin Carlisle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Assessment of benefits and risks in development of targeted therapies for cancer--The view of regulatory authorities.

Authors:  Francesco Pignatti; Bertil Jonsson; Gideon Blumenthal; Robert Justice
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 10.  European perspective for effective cancer drug development.

Authors:  Denis Lacombe; Sabine Tejpar; Roberto Salgado; Fatima Cardoso; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Daniela Aust; Gunnar Folprecht; Arnaud Roth; Roger Stupp
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.