Literature DB >> 18787089

Corticospinal-evoked responses in lower limb muscles during voluntary contractions at varying strengths.

T Oya1, B W Hoffman, A G Cresswell.   

Abstract

This study investigated corticospinal-evoked responses in lower limb muscles during voluntary contractions at varying strengths. Similar investigations have been made on upper limb muscles, where evoked responses have been shown to increase up to approximately 50% of maximal force and then decline. We elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and cervicomedullary motor-evoked potentials (CMEPs) in the soleus (Sol) and medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscles using magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex and cervicomedullary junction during voluntary plantar flexions with the torque ranging from 0 to 100% of a maximal voluntary contraction. Differences between the MEP and CMEP were also investigated to assess whether any changes were occurring at the cortical or spinal levels. In both Sol and MG, MEP and CMEP amplitudes [normalized to maximal M wave (Mmax)] showed an increase, followed by a plateau, over the greater part of the contraction range with responses increasing from approximately 0.2 to approximately 6% of Mmax for Sol and from approximately 0.3 to approximately 10% of Mmax for MG. Because both MEPs and CMEPs changed in a similar manner, the observed increase and lack of decrease at high force levels are likely related to underlying changes occurring at the spinal level. The evoked responses in the Sol and MG increase over a greater range of contraction strengths than for upper limb muscles, probably due to differences in the pattern of motor unit recruitment and rate coding for these muscles and the strength of the corticospinal input.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18787089     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90586.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  12 in total

1.  Intensity-dependent alterations in the excitability of cortical and spinal projections to the knee extensors during isometric and locomotor exercise.

Authors:  J C Weavil; S K Sidhu; T S Mangum; R S Richardson; M Amann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Specific modulation of corticospinal and spinal excitabilities during maximal voluntary isometric, shortening and lengthening contractions in synergist muscles.

Authors:  Julien Duclay; Benjamin Pasquet; Alain Martin; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Non-invasive Assessment of Changes in Corticomotoneuronal Transmission in Humans.

Authors:  Wolfgang Taube; Christian Leukel; Jens Bo Nielsen; Jesper Lundbye-Jensen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Kinesio-Taping Application and Corticospinal Excitability at the Ankle Joint.

Authors:  Francois Tremblay; Siobhan Karam
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  Corticospinal responses to sustained locomotor exercises: moving beyond single-joint studies of central fatigue.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu; Andrew G Cresswell; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Cortical and spinal excitability during and after lengthening contractions of the human plantar flexor muscles performed with maximal voluntary effort.

Authors:  Daniel Hahn; Ben W Hoffman; Timothy J Carroll; Andrew G Cresswell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Surgical leg rotation: cortical neuroplasticity assessed through brain mapping using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Luigi Tesio; Maria Grazia Benedetti; Viviana Rota; Marco Manfrini; Laura Perucca; Antonio Caronni
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  Differences in supraspinal and spinal excitability during various force outputs of the biceps brachii in chronic- and non-resistance trained individuals.

Authors:  Gregory E P Pearcey; Kevin E Power; Duane C Button
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The influence of residual force enhancement on spinal and supraspinal excitability.

Authors:  Caleb T Sypkes; Benjamin J Kozlowski; Jordan Grant; Leah R Bent; Chris J McNeil; Geoffrey A Power
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Presetting of the Corticospinal Excitability in the Tibialis Anterior Muscle in Relation to Prediction of the Magnitude and Direction of Postural Perturbations.

Authors:  Kimiya Fujio; Hiroki Obata; Noritaka Kawashima; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.