Literature DB >> 18786958

Factors affecting outcome of punctoplasty surgery: a review of 205 cases.

H Shahid1, A Sandhu, T Keenan, A Pearson.   

Abstract

AIM: We reviewed retrospectively the indications, surgical techniques and outcomes of punctoplasty surgery for 205 consecutive patients in order to identify factors that influence success.
METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent punctoplasty surgery from April 2002 to June 2006 within the Royal Berkshire NHS Trust, UK. No patient had an additional procedure simultaneously. Hospital records were used to ascertain the proportion of patients who were appropriately assessed preoperatively, the anatomical and functional success rates for surgery and the patient satisfaction rate. We assessed the influence of surgical technique, grade of operating surgeon and the use of postoperative topical medication on these outcomes.
RESULTS: Eighty-two per cent of patients had an appropriate preoperative assessment. Amongst these, the anatomical and functional success rates for punctoplasty surgery were 91% and 64%, respectively. The patient satisfaction rate was 71%. The grade of surgeon did not significantly affect outcome of punctoplasty (p = 0.4). The use of topical steroids postoperatively did not significantly improve surgical outcome (p = 0.7). There was no significant difference in anatomical success between a two-snip versus a three-snip punctoplasty technique (p = 0.7). However, in the presence of anatomical success the two-snip procedure gave significantly greater functional success (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest reported consecutive case series of isolated punctoplasty surgery. Overall anatomical success was high and the surgical technique, grade of surgeon and choice of postoperative medication did not significantly alter the outcome. Without adequate preoperative assessment a significant proportion of patients may undergo surgery inappropriately. Even with an adequate assessment anatomical success is not always followed by resolution of epiphora.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18786958     DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.140681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  8 in total

Review 1.  Long-term outcomes of punch punctoplasty with Kelly punch and review of literature.

Authors:  E S Wong; E Y Li; H K Yuen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  A histopathological study of lacrimal puncta in patients with primary punctal stenosis.

Authors:  Jeong Kyeong Jang; Sang Min Lee; Helen Lew
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  A novel surgical technique for punctal stenosis: placement of three interrupted sutures after rectangular three-snip punctoplasty.

Authors:  Seong Jun Park; Ju Hee Noh; Ki Bum Park; Sun Young Jang; Jong Won Lee
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Punctal stenosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Uri Soiberman; Hirohiko Kakizaki; Dinesh Selva; Igal Leibovitch
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-03

5.  Presumed Virus-Induced Punctal Occlusion.

Authors:  Michael Yulish; Joseph Pikkel
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2014-11-13

6.  The Mini-Monoka punctocanaliculoplasty.

Authors:  Md Shahid Alam
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Classification of Lacrimal Punctal Stenosis and Its Related Histopathological Feature in Patients with Epiphora.

Authors:  Mun Chong Hur; Sang Wook Jin; Mi Sook Roh; Woo Jin Jeong; Won Yeol Ryu; Yoon Hyung Kwon; Hee Bae Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10

8.  Adjunctive Punctal Re-Dilation for Early Postoperative Cicatrization after One-Snip Punctoplasty.

Authors:  Fatma Corak Eroglu; Emine Sen; Burcu Kazancı
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2021-12-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.