Literature DB >> 18786950

Why do parents' education level and income affect the amount of fruits and vegetables adolescents eat?

Elling Bere1, Frank van Lenthe, Knut-Inge Klepp, Johannes Brug.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are large socioeconomic disparities in food behaviours. The objective of the present study is to longitudinally explore socioeconomic disparities in adolescents' fruit and vegetable (FV) intake and to assess mediators of the disparity.
METHODS: A longitudinal study containing 896 adolescents from 20 randomly selected elementary schools within two Norwegian counties (response rate 84%). Questionnaires were administered in May 2002 (mean age 12.5 years) and again in May 2005. FV intake was measured by four food frequency questions (times/week). Socioeconomic status was based on parents' reports of their own educational level and family income (both dichotomized). Data were analysed with repeated mixed models.
RESULTS: A disparity in adolescents' FV intake was observed with family income (1.1 times/week, P = 0.05). An interaction between parental education and time (survey) was found for parental education (P = 0.04) and the educational disparity was greater in 2005 (2.4 times/week, P < 0.001) than in 2002 (1.3 times/week, P = 0.03). In multiple mediation analyses, a total of 92% (2002) and 60% (2005) of the educational disparity and 89% of the income disparity, were explained. For both, the adolescents' reports of the accessibility of FV at home explained most of the disparity.
CONCLUSIONS: Perceived accessibility appears to be the strongest mediator of the relationship between adolescents' FV intake and their parents' educational level and income and may therefore be an important target for future interventions that aim to reduce socioeconomic disparities in adolescents' FV intake.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18786950     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  26 in total

1.  Qualitative study to explore Prospect Theory and message framing and diet and cancer prevention-related issues among African American adolescents.

Authors:  Jessie A Satia; Jameta Barlow; Janelle Armstrong-Brown; Joanne L Watters
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  The Relationship between Media Use and Body Mass Index among Secondary Students in Kuching South City, Sarawak, Malaysia.

Authors:  Whye Lian Cheah; Ching Thon Chang; Saimon Rosalia; Lai Dekun Charles; Sze Lin Yii; Pik Hoong Tiong; Kim Pey Yeap
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2011-07

3.  School food reduces household income disparities in adolescents' frequency of fruit and vegetable intake.

Authors:  Meghan R Longacre; Keith M Drake; Linda J Titus; Karen E Peterson; Michael L Beach; Gail Langeloh; Kristy Hendricks; Madeline A Dalton
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Inequities in energy-balance related behaviours and family environmental determinants in European children: baseline results of the prospective EPHE evaluation study.

Authors:  Krystallia Mantziki; Achilleas Vassilopoulos; Gabriella Radulian; Jean-Michel Borys; Hugues Du Plessis; Maria João Gregório; Pedro Graça; Stefaan De Henauw; Svetoslav Handjiev; Tommy Ls Visscher; Jacob C Seidell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Changes in 10-12 year old's fruit and vegetable intake in Norway from 2001 to 2008 in relation to gender and socioeconomic status - a comparison of two cross-sectional groups.

Authors:  Marit Hilsen; Maartje M van Stralen; Knut-Inge Klepp; Elling Bere
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Short- and medium-term efficacy of a Web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention for adults including cognitive and environmental feedback: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Linda Springvloet; Lilian Lechner; Hein de Vries; Math J J M Candel; Anke Oenema
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Nutrition promotion approaches preferred by Australian adolescents attending schools in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lena D Stephens; Sarah A McNaughton; David Crawford; Kylie Ball
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  Long-term efficacy of a Web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention for adults including cognitive and environmental feedback: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Linda Springvloet; Lilian Lechner; Hein de Vries; Anke Oenema
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Effects of a 20-month cluster randomised controlled school-based intervention trial on BMI of school-aged boys and girls: the HEIA study.

Authors:  May Grydeland; Mona Bjelland; Sigmund Alfred Anderssen; Knut-Inge Klepp; Ingunn Holden Bergh; Lene Frost Andersen; Yngvar Ommundsen; Nanna Lien
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Planned development and evaluation protocol of two versions of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention aimed at adults, including cognitive and environmental feedback.

Authors:  Linda Springvloet; Lilian Lechner; Anke Oenema
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.