Literature DB >> 18786746

Emergency department admissions are more profitable than non-emergency department admissions.

Philip L Henneman1, Michael Lemanski, Howard A Smithline, Andrew Tomaszewski, Janice A Mayforth.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We compare the contribution margin per case per hospital day of emergency department (ED) admissions with non-ED admissions in a single hospital, a 600-bed, academic, tertiary referral, Level I trauma center with an annual ED census of 100,000.
METHODS: This was a retrospective comparison of the contribution margin per case per day for ED and non-ED inpatient admissions for fiscal years 2003, 2004, and 2005 (October 1 through September 30). Contribution margin is defined as net revenue minus total direct costs; it is then expressed per case per hospital day. Service lines are a set of linked patient care services. Observation admissions and outpatient services are not included. Resident expenses (eg, salary and benefits) and revenue (ie, Medicare payment of indirect medical expenses and direct medical expenses) are not included. Overhead expenses are not included (eg, building maintenance, utilities, information services support, administrative services).
RESULTS: For fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2005, there were 51,213 ED and 57,004 non-ED inpatient admissions. Median contribution margin per day for ED admissions was higher than for non-ED admissions: ED admissions $769 (interquartile range $265 to $1,493) and non-ED admissions $595 (interquartile range $178 to $1,274). Median contribution margin per day varied by site of admissions, by diagnosis-related group, by service line, and by insurance type.
CONCLUSION: In summary, ED admissions in our institution generate a higher contribution margin per day than non-ED admissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18786746     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  7 in total

1.  A conceptual model for assessing quality of care for patients boarding in the emergency department: structure-process-outcome.

Authors:  Shan W Liu; Sara J Singer; Benjamin C Sun; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Improving Hospital Efficiency Through Data-Driven Management: A Case Study of Health First, Florida.

Authors:  Janice C Blanchard; Robert S Rudin
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2016-05-09

3.  The big hurt: Trauma system funding in today's health care environment.

Authors:  Douglas Geehan
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

4.  Percentage of US emergency department patients seen within the recommended triage time: 1997 to 2006.

Authors:  Leora I Horwitz; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-09

5.  The efficacy and value of emergency medicine: a supportive literature review.

Authors:  C James Holliman; Terrence M Mulligan; Robert E Suter; Peter Cameron; Lee Wallis; Philip D Anderson; Kathleen Clem
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-22

6.  Decreasing Emergency Department Walkout Rate and Boarding Hours by Improving Inpatient Length of Stay.

Authors:  Andrew W Artenstein; Niels K Rathlev; Douglas Neal; Vernette Townsend; Michael Vemula; Sheila Goldlust; Joseph Schmidt; Paul Visintainer
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-09-18

7.  Health outcomes in US children with abdominal pain at major emergency departments associated with race and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Louise Wang; Corinna Haberland; Cary Thurm; Jay Bhattacharya; K T Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.