Literature DB >> 18786673

Analysis of musk fragrances in environmental samples.

Kai Bester1.   

Abstract

The methods for the determination of polycyclic and nitro-aromatic musk compounds in comparison to other fragrances such as OTNE ([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydro-2,3,8,8-tetramethylnaphthalen-2yl] ethan-1-one) as well as those for the respective metabolites are described in this contribution. It covers instrumental aspects, as well as procedures for extraction and clean-up. Protocols for the determination of musks in water, sludge, biota, and air are summarised and discussed. Extractions by means of solid phase extraction (SPE) and liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) in case of water samples are evaluated for the diverse applications, i.e., wastewater, surface water and seawater. While LLE is preferred for the analysis of bulk for transport studies and for special process studies SPE might be worth the effort. Considering sludge, sediment and biota samples, drying and successive accelerated solvent extraction. Soxhlet extractions as well as cold column extractions are being compared. ASE has proven to be the most exhaustive and quickest to adopt method. Clean-up by means of size exclusion chromatography and silica sorption chromatography with their respective merits and problems are demonstrated. Suggestions for routine and research analysis are also given. The diverse approaches for enantioselective separations are discussed in respect to HHCB, AHTN and the metabolite HHCB-lactone. The power of two-dimensional (GCxGC) approaches is demonstrated considering the various production impurities (isomers) of the two polycyclic musks with the highest usage rates. The usage of tandem mass spectrometry and high resolution mass spectrometry for the same purpose is also discussed. The identification of an isomer of the HHCB-transformation product HHCB-lactone from wastewater treatment that has not been described in the literature before, is presented as well. Additionally some ideas to make the REACh process more efficient are discussed considering the special experiences from the development of the analysis of musk fragrances in the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18786673     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.08.093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  3 in total

1.  Non-target screening analysis of river water as compound-related base for monitoring measures.

Authors:  Jan Schwarzbauer; Mathias Ricking
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Identification strategy for unknown pollutants using high-resolution mass spectrometry: androgen-disrupting compounds identified through effect-directed analysis.

Authors:  Jana M Weiss; Eszter Simon; Gerard J Stroomberg; Ronald de Boer; Jacob de Boer; Sander C van der Linden; Pim E G Leonards; Marja H Lamoree
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 3.  Analytical methodologies for the determination of endocrine disrupting compounds in biological and environmental samples.

Authors:  Zoraida Sosa-Ferrera; Cristina Mahugo-Santana; José Juan Santana-Rodríguez
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.