Literature DB >> 18785685

Comparison of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses of photoluminescent silicon nanoparticles with silicon micron-sized particles in RAW 264.7 macrophages.

Jonghoon Choi1, Qin Zhang, Vytas Reipa, Nam Sun Wang, Melvin E Stratmeyer, Victoria M Hitchins, Peter L Goering.   

Abstract

Photoluminescent silicon nanoparticles have a bright and stable fluorescence and are promising candidates for bio-imaging, cell staining and drug delivery. With increasing development of nanotechnology applications for biomedicine, an understanding of the potential toxicity of nanoparticles is needed to assess safety concerns for clinical applications. The objective of this study was to compare biological responses of silicon nanoparticles (SNs, 3 nm diameter) with silicon microparticles (SMs, approximately 100-3000 nm diameter) in cultured murine macrophages (RAW 264.7) using standard protocols for assessing cytotoxicity/cell viability and inflammatory responses developed for micron-sized particles. SNs and SMs were exposed to macrophages with and without addition of endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a positive inducer of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and nitric oxide (NO). Cytotoxicity was assayed using the dye exclusion and MTT assays. Cell supernatants were assayed for production TNF-alpha, IL-6 and NO. SNs at concentrations < or = 20 microg ml(-1) exhibited no cytotoxicity or inflammatory responses; however, SNs and SMs >20 and 200 microg ml(-1), respectively, increased cytotoxicity compared with controls. SMs induced concentration-related increases in TNF-alpha and IL-6 production; in contrast, the production of these cytokines was shown to decrease with increasing concentrations of SNs. NO production was not induced by SNs or SMs alone. Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that SNs were associated with the macrophages, either internalized or attached to cell membranes. In conclusion, evaluating differences in biological responses for nanoparticles compared with microparticles of the same material may help improve tests to assess biological responses of nanoparticles that may be used in biomedical applications. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18785685     DOI: 10.1002/jat.1382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  12 in total

1.  Mitotic trafficking of silicon microparticles.

Authors:  Rita E Serda; Silvia Ferrati; Biana Godin; Ennio Tasciotti; XueWu Liu; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  Synergistic effects of engineered nanoparticles and organics released from laser printers using nano-enabled toners: potential health implications from exposures to the emitted organic aerosol.

Authors:  Marie-Cecile G Chalbot; Sandra V Pirela; Laura Schifman; Varun Kasaraneni; Vinka Oyanedel-Craver; Dhimiter Bello; Vincent Castranova; Yong Qian; Treye Thomas; Ilias G Kavouras; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2017-08-30

3.  Molecular responses of mouse macrophages to copper and copper oxide nanoparticles inferred from proteomic analyses.

Authors:  Sarah Triboulet; Catherine Aude-Garcia; Marie Carrière; Hélène Diemer; Fabienne Proamer; Aurélie Habert; Mireille Chevallet; Véronique Collin-Faure; Jean-Marc Strub; Daniel Hanau; Alain Van Dorsselaer; Nathalie Herlin-Boime; Thierry Rabilloud
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 4.  Biocompatibility assessment of Si-based nano- and micro-particles.

Authors:  Hamsa Jaganathan; Biana Godin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  In vitro investigation of silica nanoparticle uptake into human endothelial cells under physiological cyclic stretch.

Authors:  Christian Freese; Daniel Schreiner; Laura Anspach; Christoph Bantz; Michael Maskos; Ronald E Unger; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 9.400

6.  Pro-apoptotic liposomes-nanobubble conjugate synergistic with paclitaxel: a platform for ultrasound responsive image-guided drug delivery.

Authors:  Rajeet Chandan; Rinti Banerjee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Tuning the Optical Properties of Silicon Quantum Dots via Surface Functionalization with Conjugated Aromatic Fluorophores.

Authors:  Mohammed Abdelhameed; Diego Rota Martir; Shalimar Chen; William Z Xu; Olabode O Oyeneye; Subrata Chakrabarti; Eli Zysman-Colman; Paul A Charpentier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Biocompatibility of crystalline opal nanoparticles.

Authors:  Marlen Hernández-Ortiz; Laura S Acosta-Torres; Genoveva Hernández-Padrón; Alicia I Mendieta; Rodolfo Bernal; Catalina Cruz-Vázquez; Victor M Castaño
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Mild two-step method to construct DNA-conjugated silicon nanoparticles: scaffolds for the detection of microRNA-21.

Authors:  Xiaoye Su; Li Kuang; Cooper Battle; Ted Shaner; Brian S Mitchell; Mark J Fink; Janarthanan Jayawickramarajah
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.774

10.  Energy/Electron Transfer Switch for Controlling Optical Properties of Silicon Quantum Dots.

Authors:  Mohammed Abdelhameed; Shawkat Aly; Jeremy T Lant; Xiaoran Zhang; Paul Charpentier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.